On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 14:22 -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > What would you expect the routing table to look like in your case? I > suppose we could do a default route for link-local. Not sure if that > will confuse apps that expect a default route to mean an internet > connection though.
I would expect the subnet route, as NM is creating already: dest=169.254.0.0 gateway=0.0.0.0 genmask=255.255.0.0 I would also like the routing table to either include a default route: dest=0.0.0 gateway=0.0.0.0 genmask=0.0.0.0 or a multicast one: dest=224.0.0.0 gateway=0.0.0.0 genmask=240.0.0.0 The routing table that NM is setting up now is reasonable, in my opinion, but there should be some way of customizing the behaviour in the settings object. Daniel _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list