Em 5 de novembro de 2010 15:33, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>escreveu:
> On 11/05/2010 11:00 AM, José Queiroz wrote: > > 2010/11/5 Marc Herbert <marc.herb...@gmail.com> > > > PS: this does not look specific to IPv6 > > This does not look specific to NetworkManager, as long as NM is working > strictly in the limits created by the RFCs... > > > The last 64 bits are recommended to be based on the MAC address, but not > only is this not required, it is not recommended for a server. > > For example: > > $ host www.ietf.org > www.ietf.org has address 64.170.98.32 > www.ietf.org has IPv6 address 2001:1890:1112:1::20 > > > How can you tell that this address was dinamically assigned, or a full static address was designed to it? What I am saying is to add flexiblity so that other suffixes can be use. > Have you ever seen this feature in any other system?
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
