How do we get some attention to this patch and get it applied to the main source? This is a *major* issue for anyone running a persistent 3G connection.
As a workaround, is there a way to unmark as invalid after nm decides to mark as invalid, other than disconnecting and reconnecting the device? On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:56 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I also have some problems with persistent network connections and adapted > the patch below (you should find the mail in August or September list > archive), but it's solves only a part of my problems, also it makes things > much better, I have still problems from time to time, where I need to > disable and reenable the mobile broadband to get the modem reseted and > didn't found a solution so far... > > Gerald > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:networkmanager-list- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Karlstad > > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:46 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Persistent 3G connection fails, not sure why > > > > Den 27. okt. 2011 14:17, skrev David Pfeffer: > > > Actually, that patch seems to be exactly what's needed. Can this be > > > patched into the main codebase? > > > > > > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/75684426/nm-reconnect.patch > > > > > > I haven't tested it specifically but it solves the problem that seems > > > to be identical to mine. > > > I don't see where you see that they say it didn't work well for them. > > > It seems like everyone was happy with it. > > > > Yup. The people commenting on it seemed happy, but I emailed the guy > > directly and he didn't seem to enthusiastic about it now, but again, he > was > > using a USB modem and not a built-in Mini PCI-e device like mine. > > > > I personally tried applying the patch to the latest network-manager in > > Ubuntu a couple a days ago, but it never compiled. I'm guessing the code > has > > changed a bit since the patch was written. (I think it was the > NMDeviceType > > thing that didn't work.) > > > > If this actually is what it takes, then I hope someone is willing to have > a look > > at it and eventually push it upstream :-) > > > > -- > > Alexander Karlstad > > _______________________________________________ > > networkmanager-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > > _______________________________________________ > networkmanager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list >
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
