> On a related note, since ModemManager already uses AT+CRSM to read > ICCID and operator name/ID, I wonder if it makes sense to > "AT+CRSM=176,28423,0,0,9" instead of AT+CIMI for reading IMSI, or use > it as a fallback solution if AT+CIMI fails or is not supported by a > modem. > > At least on one modem I have, "AT+CRSM=176,28423,0,0,9" is far more > reliable than AT+CIMI (which may be an issue in the modem firmware). >
We can provide one as default and the other one as fallback if the first one doesn't reply a proper value. This can be done directly in the generic MMBroadbandModem. -- Aleksander _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list