On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 11:28 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > I don't consider this an experiment at this point.
Well, I do think Pavel has a point; it's true that NetworkManager is an order of magnitude more code than any other project I've used it in before, and it's larger in terms of people too. > Yes, > there is a bit of education required, but perhaps we could also work on > making some things compile-time errors instead of runtime gotchas. Would require a GCC plugin. But the way I see it is these patches don't *regress* type safety - the compiler isn't going to warn you right now if you call g_free (some_object) either. Anyways, bottom line: given the benefits, my goal here is to figure out where the bar is in the opinion of the NetworkManager developers, and do what I need to reach it. _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list