On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 08:51 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 09:54 +0200, Enrico Murador - Research &
> Development - CET wrote:
> > Ok. Problem is that I think I can't get more information regarding 
> > Windows drivers (even if I manage to get the sources, I suppose I can't 
> > freely publish the content). Now I'm trying to look for anything useful 
> > in the list of available AT commands.
> > Probably I'll have to stick with info that I already have... that should 
> > not be a problem, if I could "patch" (maybe writing udev rules by 
> > myself?) MM to work with my model only.
> > I agree that a more complete solution is the way to go, but now I have a 
> > system that is essentially not working, so one "half" solution would be 
> > better than nothing.
> > 
> > So, how can I do? Is there a way for me to "customize" MM port detection 
> > for my UC864E module?
> 
> I've pushed a dcbw/telit-plugin branch that includes the appropriate
> udev rules, and a first attempt at access technology checking based on
> some Telit documentation that I found.  Is there a chance you can try
> this branch and see if it works reliably for your device?

Enrico, any chance you've been able to test this branch out?

Dan

> Dan
> 
> > Last resort would be to "turn off" MM and manually handle the module 
> > (and the related data connection), but I must also manage a VPN on that 
> > connection, and I think NetworkManager doesn't consider data connections 
> > that are not managed by itself, so in the case I'll also have to 
> > manually handle the VPN connection...
> > 
> > Thank you
> > 
> > On 16/04/2013 19:10, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 18:23 +0200, Enrico Murador - Research &
> > > Development - CET wrote:
> > >> On 16/04/2013 17:32, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >>> What are the USB IDs again?
> > >> Do you mean VID and PID? If so:
> > >>
> > >> #define TELIT_VENDOR_ID                         0x1bc7
> > >> #define TELIT_PRODUCT_UC864E                    0x1003
> > >> #define TELIT_PRODUCT_UC864G                    0x1004
> > >> #define TELIT_PRODUCT_CC864_DUAL                0x1005
> > >> #define TELIT_PRODUCT_CC864_SINGLE              0x1006
> > >> #define TELIT_PRODUCT_DE910_DUAL                0x1010
> > >> #define TELIT_PRODUCT_LE920                     0x1200
> > > Based on the PDF, we'll need a couple of classes of rules because these
> > > devices have different USB layouts.  For example, the 910 and 920 have
> > > different layouts, and the auxiliary port number is different between
> > > the 864E and 864G.  Even the CC864-SINGLE is different than the
> > > CC864-DUAL.  But this is easy to handle with udev rules.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > networkmanager-list mailing list
> > networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> networkmanager-list mailing list
> networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to