On 07/05/13 18:47, Bjørn Mork wrote: >>>> and I don't think we should do >>>>> >>> > that e.g. for ZTE QMI modems (which are not handled with QMI >>>>> >>> > currently, >>>>> >>> > as they suck). >>> >> I'm wondering about this... Except for the ones which appear as routers >>> >> and run some buggy QMI proxy daemon, I'd expect most of the ZTE modems >>> >> to have about the same set of bugs as the other Qualcomm firmware based >>> >> modems. Modems like e.g. the MF821D look and feel pretty much like any >>> >> other MDM9200 based device. >> > >> > I have a ZTE MF637 which is QMI based, and it just ends up crashing if >> > used with QMI. I even have a branch to enable ZTE-based QMI modems >> > (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/log/?h=zte-qmi) >> > but didn't spend much time with it after my first unsuccessful attempts... > Is this a device designed to operate as a NATing router, or is it just a > "regular" modem? >
It is a plain regular HSPA modem. > The MF60 I've still got (luckily the owner seems to have forgotten about > it :) is also crashing really bad on any QMI WDS command, making it > completely useless with QMI. But this device is a wifi-3G router which > it obviously runs some QMI proxy daemon, forwarding most commands but > intercepting WDS. And the ZTE WDS implementation sucks bigtime even for > a modem firmware. > > But I was hoping we could detect and avoid the troublesome devices using > "safe" commands, without making all other devices suffer. As I said, > the MF821D works really fine with QMI. I'll retest it again tomorrow and gather debug logs to see where exactly it failed. -- Aleksander _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
