On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 23:07 +0200, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Hi, > > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3315.txt > > 15.12. Information-request Message > > Clients MUST discard any received Information-request messages. > > Servers MUST discard any received Information-request message that > meets any of the following conditions: > > - The message includes a Server Identifier option and the DUID in > the option does not match the server's DUID. > - The message includes an IA option. > > Is the behavior of the devices correct? > Are there other RFCs > (e.g. RFC 4361, RFC 5494, RFC 6221, RFC 6422, RFC 6644, RFC 7083, RFC 7227 ) > with different updated rules? > > Or I am completely wrong? > (because of mixing Server Identifier and Option Request Server Identifier?)
The also_request() is saying "please server, send me your DUID!" so it shouldn't contravene the RFC here. However, I don't think we care a lot about the server DUID in NM itself, so I think the patch should be fine. If dhclient needs the server DUID, dhclient will figure out how to get it. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
