On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 16:00 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > On 10/16/2014 07:08 AM, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > currently it is impossible to get useful network configuration for LXC > > containers on boot. (At least if they're managed via libvirt; I have no > > idea if anything is different with native LXC tooling). They're supposed > > to obtain their configuration via DHCP, but instead connection is assumed. > > Firstly because there's an IPv6 local link address that (I think) gets > > assigned when libvirt ups the interface and secondly because it's a > > software link. > > > > Why do we assume connection on all software links? Virtual ethernet devices > > are supposed to behave much like ordinary ethernet devices; they have > > carrier detection, etc. > > > > I'm following up with the patches that resolve the problem for me, but > > I'm not quite sure about the special case for veth. > > > > Thoughts? > > > This may be related to a problem in libvirt-sandbox (Secure Containers): > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-September/msg00540.html
Does that mean lxc (or libvirt or whatever) is supposed to configure the interface before spawning the container? In that case it would indeed make sense for NM to assume the connection. Lubo _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
