On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 17:44 +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to use NetworkManager with per interface routing and split > routing tables, when I use network I can put the route in a file > route-ifname with: > default via 192.168.222.1 table rt2 > > and it works, when I switched to using NM, this no longer work, I > tried several times and found that I can use: > 192.168.222.0/0 via 192.168.222.1 table rt2 > > but not "default", is this a bug or am I missing something?
initscripts pass the lines from route-ifname directly to ip-route. NetworkManager does not support all this flexibility, especially it does not support specifying routing tables... But... recently the following got merged, so if you use NetworkManager from master, it might work for you: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=6d5e62a3877491299654de99809e156fd348c549 The related bug on RHEL-7 is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160013 If you use an older NetworkManger, you might get around it by using a dispatcher script. Something like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160013#c3 Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list