> The "correct" fix, as I see it, is to kill off the interprocess > accept lock by removing the possibility of having other processes > in a *threaded* MPM. -- justin That architecture was explored in detail by Netscape. It isn't reliable and slows your web server to a crawl whenever dynamic content is produced. It should only be used for static file servers and caching gateways, and people implementing those might as well use an in-kernel server like TUX. ....Roy
- Re: Terminiting threads in a ... rbb
- [PATCH] Add intraprocess mute... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Terminiting threads in a ... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a ... rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded dean gaudet
- RE: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Benjamin W. Ritcey
- Re[2]: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threa... Jeff Stuart
- Why I think we need a SPMT model was R... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Aaron Bannert
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded rbb