At 04:45 PM 7/19/99 -0600, you wrote:

Have tried setting the file type to msdos?  
I recently couldn't get my Win95 partitions recognized or mounted correctly
until I made them msdos type.  It makes it kind of hard to read the titles
of some files (especially the mp3s)  but at least I can get to them, and the
titles expand all right in the play lists.

hgh
>
>I have a fat32 partition (my "D:" drive) after my Linux partitions on
>a 13 gig hard drive. I can mount the C: drive (/dev/hda1), but so far
>have not been able to mount /dev/hda9. Here is what I get:
>
>[ /mnt ] root # mount /dev/hda9
>       mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda9,
>       or too many mounted file systems
>       (aren't you trying to mount an extended partition,
>       instead of some logical partition inside?)
>[ /mnt ] root #                          
>
>I've tried various permutations of fstab; here is the most recent effort:
>
>[ /etc ] root # cat fstab 
>/dev/hda6    /            ext2      defaults                         1 1 
>/dev/hda7    /home        ext2      defaults                         1 2 
>/dev/hda8    none         swap      defaults                         0 0
>/dev/fd0    /mnt/floppy   auto  sync,user,noauto,nosuid,nodev,unhide 0 0
>/dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom    auto      user,noauto,nosuid,exec,nodev,ro 0 0
>none        /proc         proc      defaults                         0 0 
>none        /dev/pts      devpts    mode=0622                        0 0 
>/dev/hda1   /mnt/win      vfat      user,noauto                      0 1 
>/dev/hda9   /mnt/win2     vfat      user,noauto                      0 1
>
>  o What am I doing wrong with /dev/hda9? 
>
>  o Can I mount two /dev/hdaX's on /mnt/win, or do they need separate
>mounting points?
>
>  o Is user,noauto correct for /dev/hda9?
>
>  o Also, my swap partition gives an error. The line above used to say:
>
>/dev/hda8    swap         swap      defaults                         0 0
>
>...instead of:
>
>/dev/hda8    none         swap      defaults                         0 0
>
>...but it has failed both before and after this change. Is "none" correct,
>or is "swap"? I know that I need to explore this more, to provide info
>for analysis, but thought someone might have a suggestion.
>
>fdisk -l gives:
>
>Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1662 cylinders
>Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
>   Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
>/dev/hda1   *         1       702   5638783+   b  Win95 FAT32
>/dev/hda2           703      1662   7711200    f  Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
>/dev/hda6           703      1024   2586402   83  Linux
>/dev/hda7          1025      1534   4096543+  83  Linux
>/dev/hda8          1535      1551    136521   82  Linux swap
>/dev/hda9          1552      1662    891576    b  Win95 FAT32
>
>thanks,
>best wishes,
>
>richard myers
>
>
>

Reply via email to