what about the old ark chipset?? thats about as crappy a video chipset that I can remember..
and don't knock the virge, they were alright for their age.. I still have a 4mb virge in a linux box and it runs 1024x768 pretty well considering its age.. :-) rgds Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of et Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2002 7:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] graphic adapters On Monday 16 September 2002 11:18 pm, you wrote: > 14/09/02 8:49:32 AM, FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >Kyros Suck big donkey dick. ICK! > > > >You couldn't pay me to use one... they were the worst grafx > > card to come > > >out ever. > > > >--- > >Femme > > Worse than WANG 256k VGA? ^_^ I had one on my 386-14MHz. > > What about S3TrioV64+? Seems to me, before on-board video > became the norm, all the low-price systems were shipped with > a S3. heck if we are "digging in the dumpster" remember s3 virge, and "purge the virge" > > Actually, as long as it displays a decent resolution/color > depth, I don't see how you can fault a general-purpose grafx > card. The only application I would reccommend state-of-the- > art graphics adapters for is gaming and maybe real-time > rendering. > > > http://home.iprimus.com.au/marco75 > ICQ 135740977*********************
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
