On Thursday 24 July 2003 07:01 pm, Aron Smith wrote: > On Friday 25 July 2003 03:37 am, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Friday 25 July 2003 10:49, Sharrea wrote: > > > Difference is likely one takes the cache into account while the other > > > is reporting without cache. There is nothing to worry about. Linux > > > stores a lot in cache but releases what is required when needed (like > > > opening another app). This way Linux makes the best use of your ram. > > > > > > Someone else may have a better explanation but thats the basic gist of > > > it. > > > > > > Sharrea > > > > Or as Civileme once aptly stated:" Memory unused is memory wasted" > > Everything is the way it should be:o) > > Or as we used to say > Nothing is more useless than Altitude above you > or Runway behind you
thank you. i think i got it now. i was just kinda confused because i've looked at it before and it's never been that "full." ksim shows one, the memory shows another, and yeah, i can understand that it's cache-ing it and not diong any harm. i think i got it. the system moves fast enough and smooth enough for what i've got in here, so i think i'm diong ok. thanks again for the explanations! Mike
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
