On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 17:38:25 -0800 "Russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is from a Win list. All above my head. Any truth to it? None whatsoever. No one with any experience in security and who has not been bought off my MS seriously believes that Windows is *anywhere near* as secure as Linux or any of the Unix variants. Whoever wrote this has absolutely no idea what they are talking about. My favourite part: "You can hack the user's 'PATH' and plant a bunch of trojans and hope you can sucker the user into typing 'su' " 1. How the hell could you hack the users PATH if you cannot gain access in the first place with one of the millions of mind-blowingly trivial exploits like MS-Blaster or other worms? 2. Notice that the writer uses the word "hope", ie. compromising a Linux system *requires the participation of the user*, whereas the same is not true on Windows. For more info on this: http://securityfocus.com/columnists/188 http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdf The idea that script kiddies will find ways to exploit *nix systems as they become more popular on the desktop is a myth, and the people that spout this garbage usually have a serious case of "OS Envy". -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "Athens built the Acropolis. Corinth was a commercial city, interested in purely materialistic things. Today we admire Athens, visit it, preserve the old temples, yet we hardly ever set foot in Corinth."-- Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Laureate in chemistry
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
