On Saturday 10 January 2004 14:44, Richard Urwin wrote: > On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 1:37 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: > > Could you not simple let POPFilter collect from the Postfix > > folder and set the header line? KMail would then collect from > > there and filter on it. > > I assume you mean POPFile? POPFilter seems to be something > different.
Sorry - brain not in gear. POPFile, of course. > I would have used POPFile, but I don't use POP3, and > POPFile wont support SMTP until February 15th. It only does > Bayesian analysis, anyway. I must be misunderstanding you here. I'm not sure why you're worried about smtp? On my system I collect mail from pop3 accounts (I no longer have an imap one, but the same would apply) and a local account. All my external mail goes through POPFile, and by definition there will be no spam on the local mail, so I don't bother putting that through POPFile, though I would have thought it quite easy if you did want to. > If I can get SpamAssassin in it is more > powerful. I have to question that. I know it's better known, but I get far better rates under POPFile than I did when I tried SA. POPFile functions typically at 99.87% accuracy. I don't think you can better that. Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302 Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com