On Friday 12 March 2004 11:33 pm, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On Mar 12, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Alaa The Great wrote: > >> msec will probably change it back so I will probably have to figure > >> out again (for the 3rd or 4th time) how to manipulate the msec tables > >> > >> :-) to get it to stick > >> > >> But should /usr/share/man be owned by rpm:rpm? > > > > yeah for some strange reason /usr/share/man is owned by RPM on high > > security levels. > > > > you can fix this by modifying the msec table relevant to your security > > level /usr/share/msec/perm.[0-5] > > > > the line would look like this > > /usr/share/man rpm.rpm 710 > > > > either change the permissions or change the groups > > > > /usr/share/man rpm.man 755 > > hi > > Yeah, I just changed it to read > > /usr/share/man rpm.rpm 711 > > And that works fine. Since man refers to this directory inside a > longer path, it only needes e(x)ecute privilege... > > Thanks for all the replies! > > Chad on a higher security level in MSEC, you may find that MSEC will change that 711 to 710, or what ever MSEC thinks it ought to be within 24 hours.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
