My friend was actually ranting on and on about the whole being lazy and the list messing with the reply-to field, and things of that nature, then eventually threw this link at me explaining why we shouldn't be worrying about it in the first place because we should have the reply-to set for the person, and use the reply to list feature in our clients.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html There's the link if anyone cares to give it a read. Honestly, I'd just like to have it so I'm not yelled at, or lectured over something I can't help. I switch to gmail for the list recently because my domain's been up and down like a seesaw due to an old mail server at my host, or something like that (I'm getting the hosting for free, so I can't really complain, nor do I get detailed reports when something goes wrong), and I can't afford to pay for a host right now. So I'm using what's available and otherwise seems to work. Weee. At any rate,I've mentioned it to Google that I want the option to disable the reply-to, now it's all on you guys to watch when you reply, until Google either gives in, or the list plays the way outlined in the above link. *shrugs* ~~ >^..^< ~~ I'm a gmail users! I'm still waiting on them to listen to my request to allow me to disable my reply-to field. If you get this message via a mailing list, please double check the to field before sending your reply. Thanks much! ^_^ ~~ >^..^< ~~ http://deathkitten.net "Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind." ~Rudyard Kipling
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________