According to KDE Interview at /.
it is still a memmory HOG abit somehwat slightly less
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of M Thompson
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 1999 9:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: <TID> Re: [newbie] desktop vs CPU/memory?
>
>
> Does anyone know if KDE 2.0 is also a memory hog?
>
>
> Matt
>
>
> >From: "Thomas J. Hamman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [newbie] desktop vs CPU/memory?
> >Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:13:48 -0500 (EST)
> >
> <snip>
>
> >I have 48MB as well, though, so I feel obligated to mention that though
> >KDE ran adequately for me, it DOES use more RAM than most other window
> >managers (except Gnome, which is just as bad). I get much better
> >performance from XFCE and Window Maker which are also simple, graphically
> >configurable, and easy to get comfortable with IMO.
> >
> >-Tom
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
