Bob Harman wrote:
> It reminds me of my OS/2 days: Linux may (in some cases) be harder to
> get up and running than Win9x, but once it's where you want it, it's not
> going down easily.
>
> For business use and for better performance and reliability, even
> Microsoft recommends using Win2K instead of Win9x (or WinME).
>
> Bob
clap clap clap for u and for all us penguinistas too
>
>
> Goldenpi wrote:
> >
> > Well windows does take less setting up. But linux has better memory use. And
> > windows comes with, erm, windows. Linux comes with lots of free software.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Hugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 2:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] Yo
> >
> > > And Doug you forgot to mention the pretty blue screens you get
> > > And all for free!!!! NOT! LOL
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> > > > Jason Ashman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Hey Linux users. I am a Microsoft convert, Windows SUCKS!
> > > >
> > > > With Linux you will spend more time trying to get things up and going
> > > > than you ever would using windows.
> > > > If you want to wast your hartbeats getting LINUX to do stuff that
> > > > windows does right out of the box so be it.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Windows-Where Do You Want To Go Today!
> > > > LINUX-Applications on linux just seem 2nd rate after using
> > > > Windows, It's memory hungry and slow!
> > > > *************************************************************
> > > > Doug
> > > > Eldora,IA USA--------------Home Of The Bad Boys!
> > > > Visit My Web Page At:
> > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~neptuned/index.html
> > > > http://hometown.aol.com/theneptune59/index.html
> > > > E-Mail:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > *************************************************************
> > > > MHS Class Of 78 Marshalltown High School-Marshalltown,IA USA
> > > > *************************************************************
> > >
