What? I do all of my text editing/writing in emacs and I have the
downloaded verison. I can't imagine that the "complete" version
wouldn't have it since the download version is basically the first to
disks of the other versions.
Fire up drakconf, start the package manager there, choose installing and
search for emacs. You'll find it.
Abe
Len Lawrence wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, civileme wrote:
>
> > Ummm, do you realize that the install of 7.2 you made probably has both emacs
> > and xemacs? These run like Micro-EMACS (same commands plus some features)
> > without a new compile.
>
> The 7.2 Complete distribution does not appear to have emacs. I had to
> install xemacs, which is fortunately able to use most of my old
> customization file (.emacs), although there are one or two keys which can
> no longer be used.
>
> >
> > The one link I found for a port of Micro-EMACS to linux _says_ it is GPL, but
> > the original text from the author suggests it is shareware.
> >
> > It compiles easily, it runs nicely (in a terminal), and it supports a nice
> > subset of emacs commands. The port does use French messages. It runs from
> > whatever directory you put the binary into after compiling. It appears to
> > demand that any files edited BE in that directory, because it doesn't appear
> > to support directory paths.
> >
> > ftp.ac-grenoble.fr/ge/Office/microemacs-5.03.tgz
> >
> > is the link I used. I don't think I will use MicroEMACS unless I have a very
> > limited machine. I would dearly miss the color-coding of c, bash, perl, and
> > python source.
> >
> > Civileme
> >
> >
>
> --
> Len Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
