Anthony,
It's right there on the message. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Mark
"If you don't share your concepts and ideals, they end up being worthless,"
"Sharing is what makes them powerful."
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Anthony Daniell wrote:
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:41:54 +1000
> From: Anthony Daniell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
>
> Does anyone know adam's email address as he keeps sending the same email to
> the list
>
> Just visiting this planet,
> Please sign the Linux Driver petition
> http://www.libranet.com/petition.html
> http://ants.www4.50megs.com/linux.html
> http://www.50megs.com
> Anthony Daniell
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
> >
> >
> > > maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
> > > english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks I know
> > > that speak and write the language as their mother tongue!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > "If you don't share your concepts and ideals, they end up being
> > worthless,"
> > > "Sharing is what makes them powerful."
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Kyle Baker wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:02:31 -0800 (PST)
> > > > From: Kyle Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
> > > >
> > > > The incredibly poor grammar and egregious spelling (in)ability
> > > > was far worse than the autoreply, which is saying a lot...
> > > >
> > > > --- rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I vote for the poor spelling and improper grammar (it's=it is,
> > > > > as an
> > > > > example). Spam can be dealt with. Incorrigibles cannot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rob
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday 26 February 2001 21:56, you wrote:
> > > > > > I don't really know which is more annoying-----the
> > > > > autoreply, or the
> > > > > > poor spelling.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cyber Sam wrote:
> > > > > > > You my knowledge, having an autoreply assigned to my email
> > > > > is not
> > > > > > > spamming, if in the opinion of the moderators of this list
> > > > > it is
> > > > > > > considered spam, I should let you know that I run a legal
> > > > > business on
> > > > > > > the web that requires that my customers get a timely reply
> > > > > to all of
> > > > > > > there queries.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have had my legal department look at what constitutes
> > > > > 'SPAM' and in
> > > > > > > there opinion, since the autoreply does not imply or
> > > > > solicited you to
> > > > > > > do anything, only supplies information, it can not be
> > > > > legally
> > > > > > > considered 'SPAM'.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you do not like the fact that my company has an
> > > > > autoreply assigned
> > > > > > > to it's email, you have the choice of filtering it out, or
> > > > > ignoring
> > > > > > > it. Reporting it to the anti-spam groups will not cause me
> > > > > to change
> > > > > > > how I or how thousands of other businesses do business in
> > > > > the net.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
