Got in late on this, but here goes. Do you know if the eth0 card is on the LAN and the eth1 is dsl? Maybe the are reversed. HTH, Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quaylar Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] attached to : repost : lan problems At 13:38 06.03.2001 +0100, you wrote: >it has to be a configuration failure somewhere, i just switched the lan >card on the linux box and it still doesnt work. >has anybody suggestions on common conf. mistakes in win2000 and linux ? > > >--quay > > so far.....i found out a few more things : i did a "tcpdump -i eth0" and issued a "ping 192.168.0.2" (win machine) upon this i saw lots of arp requests flooding by "arp who-has 192.168.0.2 tell 192.168.0.1": does this mean linux is broadcasting an arp request over eth0 and the win box is only not answering ? i also switched the lan cards in the linux server (there are 2 : 1 for internal, 1 for my dsl modem). i reconfigured the cards to use the one for lan that had been used for my dsl modem before (i also set 10base-2 for this card), still no change. i have 2 routes for the eth0 interface : 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth0 shoud be ok, shouldnt it ? --quay