Got in late on this, but here goes.  Do you know if the eth0 card is on the LAN and 
the eth1 is dsl?  Maybe the are reversed.

HTH,
Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quaylar
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] attached to : repost : lan problems


At 13:38 06.03.2001 +0100, you wrote:

>it has to be a configuration failure somewhere, i just switched the lan 
>card on the linux box and it still doesnt work.
>has anybody suggestions on common conf. mistakes in win2000 and linux ?
>
>
>--quay
>
>


so far.....i found out a few more things :

i did a "tcpdump -i eth0" and issued a "ping 192.168.0.2" (win machine)
upon this i saw lots of arp requests flooding by "arp who-has 192.168.0.2 
tell 192.168.0.1":
does this mean linux is broadcasting an arp request over eth0 and the win 
box is only not answering ?

i also switched the lan cards in the linux server (there are 2 : 1 for 
internal, 1 for my dsl modem). i reconfigured the cards to use
the one for lan that had been used for my dsl modem before (i also set 
10base-2 for this card), still no change.

i have 2 routes for the eth0 interface :

192.168.0.1      0.0.0.0             255.255.255.255             eth0
192.168.0.0      0.0.0.0             255.255.255.0                eth0

shoud be ok, shouldnt it ?

--quay



Reply via email to