i got a question regarding the last w3c format for the protocols. was it
free? as in
can open source take the last format and extend n upgrade it for *nix, etc?
i believe open source is more powerful than proprietary format if only
because it grows and changes so much faster than proprietary stuff. meaning
that open source might/could take the lead there and everybody else follows
two bits worth

----- Original Message -----
From: "civileme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Sridhar Dhanapalan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] FW: [OT] W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards
for the Web (important for all FREE SOFTWARE supporters.)


> On Monday 01 October 2001 04:54, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> > This isn't quite as bad as it looks, IMHO. I don't believe that Tim
> > Berners-Lee would lend his name to something repressive. His stated
vision
> > has always been for a free and open WWW. I think that the W3C is simply
> > waking up to the disturbing reality that just about anything can be
> > patented in the USA. It will become increasingly difficult in the future
> > for the W3C to create their own standards without accidentally stepping
on
> > the toes of some spurious patent. Their RAND licensing seeks to address
> > this.
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 02:57:36 +0800, "Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > you guys really need to look at this, it might be time to put our
voices
> > > behind open source and free software...
> > >
> > > If companies have to pay royalties for the use of standards, (like the
> > > web for example)
> > > free software in those areas may become a thing of the past..
> > >
> > > Take apache for example, if W3C thinks up the next phase of the web,
and
> > > its a royalty product, apache may well disappear as free software,
ditto
> > > Zope and all the others....
> > >
> > >
> > > Worth thinking about...
> > >
> > >
> > > rgds
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Mead
> > > Sent: Monday, 1 October 2001 1:58 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [OT] W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web
> > >
> > >
> > > Folks... if you have not seen this there are only a few hours left to
> > > make your voice heard. Please go and read this... our internet is in
> > > danger from corporate interest again!
> > >
> > > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-09-30-001-20-NW-CY
> > >
> > > Send your comments here:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Cheers... :-)
> > > --
> > > csm
> > > "...software engineers, as Percy Bysshe Shelley said of poets, are the
> > > unacknowledged legislators of our time. acknowledge this reality and
try
> > > to shape it..." - stille/lessig
>
> Well, it is now officially too late to say anything about it.  Input
closed
> yesterday.
>
> Most of the posts I have seen on it have predicted a slow, agonizing death
> for W3C because of it.  We'll see what their actions are, then cope as
best
> we can.  I know if the RAND proposal is adopted that I will simply ignore
> their standards in my work, and never offer any support again.
>
> Civileme
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to