The funniest thing about all this is that they're "threatening" to stop
shipping it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Davidson
> Sent: 15 March 2002 17:26
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] <OT>M$ to stop shipping windoze?
>
>
> On Friday 15 March 2002 11:47 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 19:07, Bill Davidson wrote:
> > > Anyone think they would do it?
> > >
> > > http://theregister.co.uk/content/4/24278.html
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > ----
> >
> > It is a smokescreen to "scare" everybody (snicker) and also an obscenely
> > blatant posture posed to gain sympathy for their "case".
> >
> > If the DOJ hadn't been bought off by Republican lobbying by M$, (they
> > spent 24 million on the republicans, btw)  it's entirely probable that
> > they would have been broken up by now.  There have been three judges on
> > this case; and in every case, Microsoft (through its MSNBC news services
> > and other means) have been able to push the view that these judges were
> > biased. This trend is unparalleled as far as I know.  Judge Colleen is
> > probably going to be the last stop; the "biased judge" routine was old
> > before it started.
>
> Actually, I believe that M$ might have tied in the code for IE with
> windoze so that they could say 'See, look what happens when you remove
> IE'. They think everyone is dumb and they can just paint their
> own picture
> of how things are and that's the way it will be. Of course that's their
> problem and they'll have to rework windoze if that's in fact
> true. I think
> it would be corporate suicide if they were to stop shipping windoze.
>
> Bill
>
>


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to