Ah.. ok. One of those complicated situations.. :) I'd say the residents win because there's more floors of them than shops. But still, it's more interesting to know about shops on a map than residents (if you're using the map to locate something).
your call.. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Niklas Cholmkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the shop is on the first floor, and the 2nd and 3rd floor are occupied by > residents. How would you tag it? > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Eric Ladner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> shouldn't land areas containing shops be marked as landuse:retail? >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I mark residential areas (even those containing shops) as key:landuse >> > value:residential. If it is a building, would you recommend to add >> > key:building value:yes , or should I just let it be landuse=residential? >> > So far I've added most of the residential areas without building=yes. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > newbies mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Ladner >> >> _______________________________________________ >> newbies mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > > -- Eric Ladner _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
