>> (...) Rather odd >> if you ask me, and something I think the renderer should be able to >> handle without a layer tag. Is this a one-off, or are layer tags >> essential now? For every road, river, and way?
> Layer tags for ways crossing with a bridge or tunnel are essential (and > have always been) for every non-areal type of high-, rail-, run- and > waterway (I might have missed some sort of possible crossing way-types). > Regards, > Claudius OK, I can accept it if layers are "essential" , but I have noticed that any of the bridges over waterways I have edited seem to render OK. (But I'll change them when I happen to come across them again.) If layer tags are essential, wouldn't it be helpful to have the 'layer' tag automatically included (appear) when a 'bridge' or 'tunnel' tag is selected in the editor of choice? Just a thought. Also, does adding a bridge section with a layer of 1 mean I should also tag the surface road with a layer of 0 or is the default no tag (layer 0) good enough? Sorry to be nit-picky, but I just want to make things clearer for us newbies. Thanks for the comments Robert -- "We should give meaning to life, not wait for life to give to give us meaning. " ~ unknown ---
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
