On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jonathan Bennett<[email protected]> wrote: > Claudius wrote: >> Opposite to Andre i suggest reusing the existing outer ways (fence etc.) >> and creating a boundary-relation. The wiki article in fact solely >> focusses on the use for administrative boundaries, but you could simply >> extend it to site boundaries as well. I would suggest these tags for the >> relation: > > I'd disagree. Boundary relations are for administrative borders that may > or may not coincide with a physical feature. If you want to specify what > an area is used for, use a closed way and tag that. If you want to show > the enclosure around an area, use a separate way and tag it barrier=* > > Only use a relation to describe a feature where it *can't* be described > any other way.
Currently, it's not using a relation. Here's a link, which I forgot to include before: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.034505&lon=-2.173069&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF One of the reasons I didn't use a relation is that it doesn't have a fence the whole way around, so one of the ways that would have been in the relation was untagged, and JOSM wouldn't let me add it to to a relation. Russ _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
