Yeah, yeah ;-)  I was reading 5.1 and 4.8 and did a bit of mental
shorthand...

Unfortunately, the biggest deciding factor in my case is download time.
It's going to take quite a while to download the 5.1 (double checks
numbers...) release, and I've already got four point... *thinks* eight, so
I'll just go with what I've got.  It's not like it's going to make a huge
difference to me anyway, it's just going to be an internal apache server so
I can develop stuff locally before sticking it on my web server.

Daniel

> I hope you meant 4.8 instead of 4.1 :)
>
> However, I have been using 5.X on a multiprocessor Alpha since the
> series was released almost a year ago.  It's rock solid as well.  The
> BSD's are very, very conservative when it comes to declaring a system
> "production ready."  Even if you keep up with the -CURRENT development
> tree, they're very good.  So you can use either the 4 or the 5 series.
>
> -- 
> Soren Harward
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> newbies mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
>


_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies

Reply via email to