Michael, your perception is correct. Builder template can be annoying for a tutorial so it stick to basis and that is better in this case.
Don't know if you're aware all the examples are avaliable as complete code, like: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/tree/master/examples/application1 You can reach using IRC (#newcomers, #gnome-builder) for further doubts or improvements El lun., 27 ago. 2018 15:07, Michael Vetter <[email protected]> escribió: > Hello, > > as a Newcomer I started to follow this guide: > https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/ch01s04.html#id-1.2.3.12.5 > > Which I think is very good. > I chose gnome-builder in favour of vim to have a better gnomeish > experience. > > When one starts a default project in Builder the application is > slightly differntly organized than in above mentioned tutorial. Which > on some occasions creates problems for me since I'm not yet able to > understand what exactly is different and how to apply the tutorials > code to fit with Builders default code. > > I assume that the Tutorial uses a simpler way of constructing the > application and that Builders is a bit more future-proof for an > application that will get more extended. > > Would it be possible if somebody knowledgeable enough could update the > tutorial to be more based on Builders default project? > > I struggle already with things like fitting `G_APPLICATION_CLASS > (class)->open = example_app_open;` in there. > > Best, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > newcomers-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/newcomers-list >
_______________________________________________ newcomers-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/newcomers-list
