http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/21/AR2008092102432_pf.html
 
Senate Boosts Funding for Laser Weapons

By Walter Pincus
Monday, September 22, 2008; A13

 

The Senate has embraced last year's Defense Science Board conclusion that 
directed-energy weapons -- such as high-, medium- and low-power lasers -- hold 
great potential and should be developed as soon as possible.
In the fiscal 2009 defense authorization bill, which was approved Wednesday, 
the Senate included additional funds for laser programs and a provision 
requiring Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to accelerate work that would make 
directed-energy weapons operational in the near future.
Low-power lasers known as "dazzlers" are being used in Iraq, mounted on M-4 
rifles, "to warn or temporarily incapacitate individuals," according to the 
Defense Science Board's report. Army, Special Forces and more recently Marine 
units are using them to warn or deter drivers approaching checkpoints and to 
"defuse potential escalation of force incidents," according to the report.
Marines were given approval to use a green laser whose beam can temporarily 
reduce a person's vision when aimed from a distance of 1,000 yards, according 
to the report. These "laser optical incapacitation devices" were being procured 
on a case-by-case basis.
Laser use remains controversial because a protocol of the Geneva Conventions 
bans their use in combat when they are designed to cause permanent blindness.
Two years ago, when the lasers were introduced in Iraq, Army Lt. Col. Barry 
Venable, a Pentagon spokesman, said the devices were legal. "They don't blind 
people," he told reporters. "It's like shining a big light in your eyes," he 
said, adding that he did not know how long the "optical incapacitation" lasted.
The Senate Armed Services Committee, in its report on the fiscal 2009 
authorization bill, asked about the progress of lasers. "Years of investment 
have not resulted in any current operational high-energy laser capability," the 
committee noted in its report.
The science board said tactical laser systems could be developed for broader 
use because they "enable precision ground attack to minimize collateral damage 
in urban conflicts." The report suggested, for example, that "future gunships 
could provide extended precision lethality and sensing."
The board also proposed using lasers to protect against rockets, artillery, 
mortars and unmanned airborne vehicles by blasting them out of the sky. Last 
month, the Army awarded Boeing $36 million to continue development of a 
high-energy laser mounted on a truck that could hit overhead targets. But 
deployment is not expected until 2016, even if all goes well.
The Senate committee was critical of the "airborne laser" program, a 
first-generation missile defense system. It held back $30 million from next 
year's budget and said funds for a second version would not be authorized until 
the first shoot-down test from a 747 aircraft is conducted at the end of 2009. 
More information is needed to determine whether the system "could eventually 
provide a militarily useful, operationally effective and affordable missile 
defense capability," the panel's report said.
Past Defense Science Board studies have had impact. A 2004 report recommended a 
"Manhattan Project" approach to take "available and emerging technologies . . . 
to identify objects or people of interest from surveillance data and to verify 
a specific individual's identification." It suggested that "biometrics, tags, 
object recognition and identification tokens" be harnessed with sensors and 
databases "to overcome the shortcomings of conventional intelligence, 
surveillance, and reconnaissance systems."
Tags allow distant tracking or detection. Some tags are active, emitting radio 
waves that can be collected. Others are passive, including chemicals that give 
off a color when hit by an infrared beam. The board said these "represent a 
very important area for research and technology development."
Four years later, Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward, 
discussing his new book, "The War Within," on CBS's "60 Minutes," attributed 
part of the success of the troop buildup in Iraq to "secret operational 
capabilities that have been developed by the military to locate, target and 
kill leaders of al-Qaeda in Iraq, insurgent leaders, renegade militia leaders. 
That is one of the true breakthroughs."
A recent congressional report said Special Forces in Iraq are using newly 
developed "sophisticated capabilities to identify, find, track, and kill or 
capture high-value individuals."
National security and intelligence reporter Walter Pincus pores over the 
speeches, reports, transcripts and other documents that flood Washington and 
every week uncovers the fine print that rarely makes headlines -- but should. 
If you have any items that fit the bill, please send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mark R. Taylor
 
Take no prisoners!
 

http://americantruckersatwar.com
AmericanTruckersAtWar Discussion Group
http://youtube.com/ironponyexpress
 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are a member of the "News Sarasota" 
Google group...

To read more, go to: 


http://www.newssarasota.com 
http://newssarasotaezine.talkspot.com 


To hear more, go to: 


http://thecaptainsamerica.podomatic.com 


Enjoy the priviledge you now share with others who want to know what others 
don't...

Thanks, 

Matt Bruce
Managing Editor
News Sarasota.com
Retired 25 Year Fire-Rescue Captain
Host Of:
"The Captain's AMERICA" Show
Heard From 12 noon to 1 PM ET Monday Thru Friday
LIVE On Net Talk World.com
Across America & Around The Globe At The Speed Of The Internet...
Weekend's Overnight on The Accent Radio Network...
Check Out:
http://thecaptainsamerica.com
http://www.nettalkworld.com

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/News-Sarasota...

To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to