FREEDOM ASSOCIATION SPECIAL BULLETIN
No.10
May 22, 2002
THE MASSACRE IN RACAK FABRICATED As far as the cross-examination of the witnesses of The Hague
Prosecution by Slobodan Milosevic goes on, it gets clearer that the alleged
massacre of civilians was fabricated in order to serve to NATO aggressors
as some kind of pretext to start the bombing of Yugoslavia.
Yesterdays and today's testimony of the Canadian general Michel
Maisoneuve, who was member of the OSCE Verification Mission and Head
of the Prizren Regional Center, has shown that, too. From his testimony one
could see that one of the key tasks of the Prosecution is to present Racak as
a crime against civilians, in order to justify the NATO aggression.
However, as much as the general
tried to respond to the suggestive Prosecutor's questions and present the Racak
events as a brutal crackdown of the Police with the locals, confronted with
Milosevic's questions he seldom had to confess it was a conflict between the
Police and the KLA terrorists. After all, the OSCE Mission itself confirmed
that among the deads were KLA members as well. General Maisoneuve, for instance, on Milosevic's question could not deny
that the Verification Mission made efforts to affirm the KLA as a legitimate
side in the conflict, since he was the author of the mission document where
this was explicitly specified and which Milosevic had quoted. Maisoneuve tried
to present this as an attempt of the mission to establish trust. This way he
also tried to justify the complaint raised by him and the mission as to why the
investigation judge came to Racak the day after the event escorted by the
Police. However, when asked if it meant that him and the mission are
denying the sovereignty of
Yugoslavia and Serbia on that part of their territory as well as the right of
the legal authorities of the State to eliminate the terrorists who are
violently struggling for secession, Maisoneuve had to confess that this would
not be right and that he does not consider this was the task of the
mission. Maisoneuve had to confess that in all of the occasions when OSCE
Mission's verifiers were present, the Police behaved in a correct and
professional way. In the OSCE reports, however, brutal crackdowns of Albanian
civilians by the Serbian Police were mentioned, which was done according to the
witness on the basis of testimonies of the Albanians. Maisoneuve had problems
while explaining the allegations from the mission reports about Army tank
and artillery attacks on Racak civilian homes from distance. On a
direct question if there were any victims in Racak of these mortar attacks, the
witness had to admit there were not, reducing his whole story on Army
involvement to him being told by one of his verifiers that one tank had hit a
house. He was also forced by Milosevic's cross-examination to deny that Army
individuals have accused the Police for intervening in Racak.
General Maisoneuve tried not to avoid answers to direct questions, so
that Milosevic succeeded to make his answers more useful to the Defence than to
the Prosecution. That is why judge May did his best to avoid such a situation.
When asked by Milosevic if, after everything he found out so far about the Racak
events he still personally considers there had been a massacre, May
promptly intervened and explicitly prevented him from answering that
question.
A
totally separate story are the Racak victims, for whom the OSCE mission chief
William Walker affirmed they were civilian ones killed from a close range on the
same spot, where the day after dead bodies were found. After the
cross-examination of this witness, as well as of other ones before, it came out
rather evident that these people perished in combat and were brought to one
single spot in order to make it look as if they were
executed. Milosevic has proved that serious fighting took place between the Police
and the KLA forces, trenched around the village, and that the bodies were
brought and grouped up after the Police and OSCE verifiers had withdrawn. This
was evident from the position of the bodies, as well as from the findings of the
forensic teams who examined them.
After a series of usuccessful attempts to build-up a Walker's fabricated story about Racak through testimonies of witnesses, the prosecution attempted to bring one of its own investigators to appear as witness with special goal - to present to the court a "summary" of the events in Racak, based on written statements of "many witnesses" who did not appear, as well as on tons of "documents" collected by prosecution. After a sharp complaint by President Milosevic against the "indirect witnesses", the "trial chamber" decided not to accept testimony of the prosecution investigator Barney Kelly. This was considered by many as one of the greatest defets of the prosecution, since the begining of the "trial".
To join or help this struggle,
visit: http://www.sps.org.yu/ (official SPS website) http://www.belgrade-forum.org/ (forum for the world of equals) http://www.icdsm.org/ (the international committee to defend Slobodan Milosevic) http://www.jutarnje.co.yu/ ('morning news' the only Serbian newspaper advocating liberation) |
Title: Message
- [www.ANTIC.org] Freedom fight in the Hague (10) Vladimir Krsljanin
- Miroslav Antic