Canada considers joining attack on Iraq without UN authorization 
  
Defence Minister John McCallum. (CP)  

ROBERT RUSSO


(CP) - Canada would consider contributing forces to an attack on Iraq
even if the United Nations does not sanction the military assault,
Defence Minister John McCallum said Thursday. 

It marked the first time Canada has deviated from its insistence that
joining any attack on Iraq would be predicated on UN authorization.
"Many, many countries are in a position where they are offering
contingency co-operation," McCallum said after meeting U.S. counterpart
Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon. 

"Some may say, 'We're doing it only with a UN mandate.' We're saying we
much prefer that, but we may do it otherwise." 

Aides to McCallum later insisted that the defence minister was not
actively considering any Canadian military involvement in a mission
undertaken without UN approval, but was suggesting that it could be
considered at a later date. 

"Canada is reserving the right to say no or to say yes in terms of
military participation," McCallum said. "In the case where there would
be UN approval, our answer would be yes. If there is no such
authorization by the UN, it is not yes or no, we'll decide later on." 

Asked whether that means Canada will remain on the sidelines if the
United States attacks Iraq on its own, McCallum replied: "That's not
decided yet." 

McCallum made the announcement minutes after UN weapons inspectors told
the Security Council they had found no "smoking guns" in their search
for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. 

Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix told the Security Council that Iraq
had acknowledged importing parts for its missile program - a violation
of UN sanctions. The Iraqis had also failed to allow scientists who
might have knowledge of Iraqi weapons programs to be interviewed in
private. 

But their report was bereft of the kind of incendiary flouting of UN
sanctions that might trigger a multilateral effort to topple Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein. That conflict seemed less likely after Britain
appeared to be pleading with the Bush administration for more time for
inspectors to do their work. 

Ottawa continues to believe that war is not inevitable and hopes a
military assault can be avoided, but McCallum revealed that Canadian
military planners are currently at U.S. Central Command in Tampa, Fla.,
discussing what contribution Canada would make to any UN-mandated attack
on Iraq. 

"It's necessary always to plan in advance of such a contingency,"
McCallum said. "This in no way guarantees that the government will take
that decision in the future. But we must plan for the future to keep
that contingency open." 

Canada's participation in the war planning represents something of a
departure. 

Canadian generals were not invited to the sessions until they were ready
to signal they would contribute to a UN effort to punish Baghdad. 

"There was a time when we had not indicated our position at all on Iraq
and I think some planning went on in our absence," McCallum said. "But
we have subsequently indicated that we are interested and the moment we
so indicated we were involved in those discussions." 

Canada's contribution to a U.S.-led war in Iraq might include
positioning additional ships in the Persian Gulf, providing elite
commandos and relieving U.S. troops stationed in Afghanistan, defence
officials have said. 

The United States has loudly complained about Canada's relatively puny
spending on defence as a percentage of gross domestic product. 

McCallum said Rumsfeld was "very happy" with what Canada is offering as
a battlefield contribution in any potential war against Iraq. 

The Canadian military has been facing a funding crisis due to a decade
of cutbacks and many analysts say the country has very little to offer a
potential coalition. 

A Senate committee even went so far last fall as to suggest that
Canadian Forces should not be sent on a foreign deployment for at least
two years in order to address a shortfall in equipment and training. 

McCallum told reporters he has requested more money in the budget for
defence. He said he won't know what will happen until the budget is
tabled in February. 

"The answers are not definite before the budget, but I've done the best
that I could. I know there is public support for defence these days, so
I'm relatively optimistic." 

http://www.recorder.ca/cp/National/030109/n0109124A.html

C The Canadian Press, 2003





                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to