Horror Of Depleted Uranium Not Limited To Iraq 
By James Denver 

http://www.coastalpost.com/05/�04/09.htm 


    "I'm horrified. The people out there - the Iraqis, the media and
the troops - risk the most appalling ill health. And the radiation
from depleted uranium can travel literally anywhere. It's going to
destroy the lives of thousands of children, all over the world. We all
know how far radiation can travel. Radiation from Chernobyl reached
Wales and in Britain you sometimes get red dust from the Sahara on
your car."
    The speaker is not some alarmist doom-sayer. He is Dr. Chris
Busby, the British radiation expert, Fellow of the University of
Liverpool in the Faculty of Medicine and UK representative on the
European Committee on Radiation Risk, talking about the best-kept
secret of this war: the fact that, by illegally using hundreds of tons
of depleted uranium (DU) against Iraq, Britain and America have
gravely endangered not only the Iraqis but the whole world. For these
weapons have released deadly, carcinogenic and mutagenic, radioactive
particles in such abundance that-whipped up by sandstorms and carried
on trade winds - there is no corner of the globe they cannot
penetrate-including Britain. For the wind has no boundaries and time
is on their side: the radioactivity persists for over 4,500,000,000
years and can cause cancer, leukemia, brain damage, kidney failure,
and extreme birth defects - killing millions of every age for
centuries to come. A crime against humanity which may, in the
 eyes of historians, rank with the worst atrocities of all time. 
   These weapons have released deadly, carcinogenic and mutagenic,
radioactive particles in such abundance that there is no corner of the
globe they cannot penetrate - including Britain.
   Yet, officially, no crime has been committed. For this story is a
dirty story in which the facts have been concealed from those who
needed them most. It is also a story we need to know if the people of
Iraq are to get the medical care they desperately need, and if our
troops, returning from Iraq, are not to suffer as terribly as the
veterans of other conflicts in which depleted uranium was used.


A Dirty Tyson 
   'Depleted' uranium is in many ways a misnomer. For 'depleted'
sounds weak. The only weak thing about depleted uranium is its price.
It is dirt cheap, toxic, waste from nuclear power plants and bomb
production. However, uranium is one of earth's heaviest elements and
DU packs a Tyson's punch, smashing through tanks, buildings and
bunkers with equal ease, spontaneously catching fire as it does so,
and burning people alive. 'Crispy critters' is what US servicemen call
those unfortunate enough to be close. And, when John Pilger
encountered children killed at a greater distance he wrote: "The
children's skin had folded back, like parchment, revealing veins and
burnt flesh that seeped blood, while the eyes, intact, stared straight
ahead. I vomited." (Daily Mirror)
   The millions of radioactive uranium oxide particles released when
it burns can kill just as surely, but far more terribly. They can even
be so tiny they pass through a gas mask, making protection against
them impossible. Yet, small is not beautiful. For these invisible
killers indiscriminately attack men, women, children and even babies
in the womb-and do the gravest harm of all to children and unborn
babies.


A Terrible Legacy 
   Doctors in Iraq have estimated that birth defects have increased by
2-6 times, and 3-12 times as many children have developed cancer and
leukaemia since 1991. Moreover, a report published in The Lancet in
1998 said that as many as 500 children a day are dying from these
sequels to war and sanctions and that the death rate for Iraqi
children under 5 years of age increased from 23 per 1000 in 1989 to
166 per thousand in 1993. Overall, cases of lymphoblastic leukemia
more than quadrupled with other cancers also increasing 'at an
alarming rate'. In men, lung, bladder, bronchus, skin, and stomach
cancers showed the highest increase. In women, the highest increases
were in breast and bladder cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.1
   On hearing that DU had been used in the Gulf in 1991, the UK Atomic
Energy Authority sent the Ministry of Defense a special report on the
potential damage to health and the environment. It said that it could
cause half a million additional cancer deaths in Iraq over 10 years.
In that war the authorities only admitted to using 320 tons of
DU-although the Dutch charity LAKA estimates the true figure is closer
to 800 tons. Many times that may have been spread across Iraq by this
year's war. The devastating damage all this DU will do to the health
and fertility of the people of Iraq now, and for generations to come,
is beyond imagining.
   The radioactivity persists for over 4,500,000,000 years killing
millions of every age for centuries to come. This is a crime against
humanity which may rank with the worst atrocities of all time.
   We must also count the numberless thousands of miscarried babies.
Nobody knows how many Iraqis have died in the womb since DU
contaminated their world. But it is suggested that troops who were
only exposed to DU for the brief period of the war were still
excreting uranium in their semen 8 years later and some had 100 times
the so-called 'safe limit' of uranium in their urine. The lack of
government interest in the plight of veterans of the 1991 war is
reflected in a lack of academic research on the impact of DU but
informal research has found a high incidence of birth defects in their
children and that the wives of men who served in Iraq have three times
more miscarriages than the wives of servicemen who did not go there.
   Since DU darkened the land Iraq has seen birth defects which would
break a heart of stone: babies with terribly foreshortened limbs, with
their intestines outside their bodies, with huge bulging tumors where
their eyes should be, or with a single eye-like Cyclops, or without
eyes, or without limbs, and even without heads. Significantly, some of
the defects are almost unknown outside textbooks showing the babies
born near A-bomb test sites in the Pacific.
   Doctors report that many women no longer say 'Is it a girl or a
boy?' but simply, 'Is it normal, doctor?' Moreover this terrible
legacy will not end. The genes of their parents may have been damaged
for ever, and the damaging DU dust is ever-present.


Blue on Blue 
   What the governments of America and Britain have done to the people
of Iraq they have also done to their own soldiers, in both wars. And
they have done it knowingly. For the battlefields have been thick with
DU and soldiers have had to enter areas heavily contaminated by
bombing. Moreover, their bodies have not only been assaulted by DU but
also by a vaccination regime which violated normal protocols,
experimental vaccines, nerve agent pills, and organophosphate
pesticides in their tents. Yet, though the hazards of DU were known,
British and American troops were not warned of its dangers. Nor were
they given thorough medical checks on their return-even though
identifying it quickly might have made it possible to remove some of
it from their body. Then, when a growing number became seriously ill,
and should have been sent to top experts in radiation damage and
neurotoxins, many were sent to a psychiatrist.
   Over 200,000 US troops who returned from the 1991 war are now
invalided out with ailments officially attributed to service in
Iraq-that's 1 in 3. In contrast, the British government's failure to
fully assess the health of returning troops, or to monitor their
health, means no one even knows how many have died or become gravely
ill since their return. However, Gulf veterans' associations say that,
of 40,000 or so fighting fit men and women who saw active service, at
least 572 have died prematurely since coming home and 5000 may be ill.
An alarming number are thought to have taken their own lives, unable
to bear the torment of the innumerable ailments which have combined to
take away their career, their sexuality, their ability to have normal
children, and even their ability to breathe or walk normally. As one
veteran puts it, they are 'on DU death row, waiting to die'.
   Whatever other factors there may be, some of their illnesses are
strikingly similar to those of Iraqis exposed to DU dust. For example,
soldiers have also fathered children without eyes. And, in a group of
eight servicemen whose babies lack eyes seven are known to have been
directly exposed to DU dust.
   They too have fathered children with stunted arms, and rare
abnormalities classically associated with radiation damage. They too
seem prone to cancer and leukemia. Tellingly, so are EU soldiers who
served as peacekeepers in the Balkans, where DU was also used. Indeed
their leukemia rate has been so high that several EU governments have
protested at the use of DU.


The Vital Evidence 
   Despite all that evidence of the harm done by DU, governments on
both sides of the Atlantic have repeatedly claimed that as it emits
only 'low level' radiation DU is harmless. Award-winning scientist,
Dr. Rosalie Bertell who has led UN medical commissions, has studied
'low-level' radiation for 30 years. 2  She has found that uranium
oxide particles have more than enough power to harm cells, and
describes their pulses of radiation as hitting surrounding cells 'like
flashes of lightning' again and again in a single second.2 Like many
scientists worldwide who have studied this type of radiation, she has
found that such 'lightning strikes' can damage DNA and cause cell
mutations which lead to cancer.
   Moreover, these particles can be taken up by body fluids and travel
through the body, damaging more than one organ. To compound all that,
Dr. Bertell has found that this particular type of radiation can cause
the body's communication systems to break down, leading to
malfunctions in many vital organs of the body and to many medical
problems. A striking fact, since many veterans of the first Gulf war
suffer from innumerable, seemingly unrelated, ailments.
   In addition, recent research by Eric Wright, Professor of
Experimental Haematology at Dundee University, and others, have shown
two ways in which such radiation can do far more damage than has been
thought. The first is that a cell which seems unharmed by radiation
can produce cells with diverse mutations several cell generations
later. (And mutations are at the root of cancer and birth defects.)
This 'radiation-induced genomic instability' is compounded by 'the
bystander effect' by which cells mutate in unison with others which
have been damaged by radiation-rather as birds swoop and turn in
unison. Put together, these two mechanisms can greatly increase the
damage done by a single source of radiation, such as a DU particle.
Moreover, it is now clear that there are marked genetic differences in
the way individuals respond to radiation-with some being far more
likely to develop cancer than others. So the fact that some veterans
of the first Gulf war seem relatively unharmed by
 their exposure to DU in no way proves that DU did not damage others. 


The Price of Truth 
   That the evidence from Iraq and from our troops, and the research
findings of such experts, have been ignored may be no accident. A US
report, leaked in late 1995, allegedly says, 'The potential for health
effects from DU exposure is real; however it must be viewed in
perspective... the financial implications of long-term disability
payments and healthcare costs would be excessive.'3
   Clearly, with hundreds of thousands gravely ill in Iraq and at
least a quarter of a million UK and US troops seriously ill, huge
disability claims might be made not only against the governments of
Britain and America if the harm done by DU were acknowledged. There
might also be huge claims against companies making DU weapons and some
of their directors are said to be extremely close to the White House.
How close they are to Downing Street is a matter for speculation, but
arms sales makes a considerable contribution to British trade. So the
massive whitewashing of DU over the past 12 years, and the way that
governments have failed to test returning troops, seemed to disbelieve
them, and washed their hands of them, may be purely to save money.
   The possibility that financial considerations have led the
governments of Britain and America to cynically avoid taking
responsibility for the harm they have done not only to the people of
Iraq but to their own troops may seem outlandish. Yet DU weapons
weren't used by the other side and no other explanation fits the
evidence. For, in the days before Britain and America first used DU in
war its hazards were no secret.4 One American study in 1990 said DU
was 'linked to cancer when exposures are internal, [and to] chemical
toxicity-causing kidney damage'. While another openly warned that
exposure to these particles under battlefield conditions could lead to
cancers of the lung and bone, kidney damage, non-malignant lung
disease, neuro-cognitive disorders, chromosomal damage and birth
defects.5


A Culture of Denial 
   In 1996 and 1997 UN Human Rights Tribunals condemned DU weapons for
illegally breaking the Geneva Convention and classed them as 'weapons
of mass destruction' 'incompatible with international humanitarian and
human rights law'. Since then, following leukemia in European
peacekeeping troops in the Balkans and Afghanistan (where DU was also
used), the EU has twice called for DU weapons to be banned.
   Yet, far from banning DU, America and Britain stepped up their
denials of the harm from this radioactive dust as more and more troops
from the first Gulf war and from action and peacekeeping in the
Balkans and Afghanistan have become seriously ill. This is no
coincidence. In 1997, while citing experiments, by others, in which 84
percent of dogs exposed to inhaled uranium died of cancer of the
lungs, Dr. Asaf Durakovic, then Professor of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine at Georgetown University in Washington was quoted as saying,
'The [US government's] Veterans Administration asked me to lie about
the risks of incorporating depleted uranium in the human body.' He
concluded, 'uranium does cause cancer, uranium does cause mutation,
and uranium does kill. If we continue with the irresponsible
contamination of the biosphere, and denial of the fact that human life
is endangered by the deadly isotope uranium, then we are doing
disservice to ourselves, disservice to the truth, disservice to
 God and to all generations who follow.' Not what the authorities
wanted to hear and his research was suddenly blocked.
   During 12 years of ever-growing British whitewash the authorities
have abolished military hospitals, where there could have been
specialized research on the effects of DU and where expertise in
treating DU victims could have built up. And, not content with the
insult of suggesting the gravely disabling symptoms of Gulf veterans
are imaginary they have refused full pensions to many. For, despite
all the evidence to the contrary, the current House of Commons
briefing paper on DU hazards says 'it is judged that any radiation
effects from possible exposures are extremely unlikely to be a
contributory factor to the illnesses currently being experienced by
some Gulf war veterans.' Note how over a quarter of a million sick and
dying US and UK vets are called 'some'.


The Way Ahead 
   Britain and America not only used DU in this year's Iraq war, they
dramatically increased its use-from a minimum of 320 tons in the
previous war to at minimum of 1500 tons in this one. And this time the
use of DU wasn't limited to anti-tank weapons-as it had largely been
in the previous Gulf war-but was extended to the guided missiles,
large bunker busters and big 2000-pound bombs used in Iraq's cities.
This means that Iraq's cities have been blanketed in lethal
particles-any one of which can cause cancer or deform a child. In
addition, the use of DU in huge bombs which throw the deadly particles
higher and wider in huge plumes of smoke means that billions of deadly
particles have been carried high into the air-again and again and
again as the bombs rained down-ready to be swept worldwide by the
winds.
   The Royal Society has suggested the solution is massive
decontamination in Iraq. That could only scratch the surface. For
decontamination is hugely expensive and, though it may reduce the
risks in some of the worst areas, it cannot fully remove them. For DU
is too widespread on land and water. How do you clean up every nook
and cranny of a city the size of Baghdad? How can they decontaminate a
whole country in which microscopic particles, which cannot be detected
with a normal geiger counter, are spread from border to border? And
how can they clean up all the countries downwind of Iraq-and, indeed,
the world?
   So there are only two things we can do to mitigate this crime
against humanity. The first is to provide the best possible medical
care for the people of Iraq, for our returning troops and for those
who served in the last Gulf war and, through that, minimize their
suffering. The second is to relegate war, and the production and sale
of weapons, to the scrap heap of history-along with slavery and
genocide. Then, and only then, will this crime against humanity be
expunged, and the tragic deaths from this war truly bring freedom to
the people of Iraq, and of the world.
References 
 1. The Lancet volume 351, issue 9103, 28 February 1998. 
 2. Rosalie Bertell's book Planet Earth the Latest Weapon of War was
reviewed in Caduceus issue 51, page 28.
 3. www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_�ii_tabl1. htm#TAB L_Research Report
Summaries
 4. www.wagingpeace.org/articles/0�2.01/020117moret.htm The secret
official memorandum to Brigadier General L.R.Groves from Drs Conant,
Compton and Urey of War Department Manhattan district dated October
1943 is available at the website
www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003/Le�uren-Moret-Gen-Groves21feb03.h�tm
 5. www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_iitab1�1.htm#tab L_research report summaries

                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [email protected]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to