<http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=754> Haider: The Death of a Populist


by Srdja Trifkovic

 

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=754#more-754

Jörg Haider , the best known Austrian politician, was killed in a car crash
on October 11. His death marks the end of a colorful career untypical for a
"far-Right" figure. Armani-clad fitness fanatic, Arnold Schwarzenegger's pal
with a permanent tan, Haider cut a figure vastly different from the bland
establishmentarians who have ran Austria for decades. Villified by the
European elite class as a neo-Nazi anti-Semite, he was a talented man of
uncertain principles, great ambition, and dubious judgment.

Haider died only weeks after his Alliance for the Future of Austria (Bündnis
Zukunft Österreich, BZÖ) won an impressive 11 percent of the vote in the
general election, while the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) – which he had led
from 1986 until 2000, and from which he split in 2005 – gained 18 per cent.
It was the best result for Austria's opponents of rampant immigration and EU
integration in the history of the Republic

Born in 1950 to a lower-middle-class family in Upper Austria, Haider never
forgot various indignities that his parents suffered after the war for
alleged Nazi sympathies. Common folks like they took the rap for the "really
big Nazis," he later complained. 

Academically brilliant and popular among peers, in his teens Haider excelled
as an actor in school plays. This talent he put to ample use in later years:
in the course of a single day he was known to change three or four outfits,
from the traditional Austrian jacket to suit-and-tie to jeans and sweater,
depending on the audience. He also had a gift for rhetoric, winning a
debating contest at 16 in support of the motion that Austrians are in fact
German.

After obtaining his law degree in Vienna Haider lectured briefly in
constitutional law, but politics was always his true vocation – and the
Freedom Party, which he joined in 1976, seemed the obvious choice for a man
with his views. Founded in 1955, for decades  the FPO combined pan-Germanism
and what might be called Central European libertarianism. It was by no means
a "far-Right" political force when Haider joined, but its position on the
issue of national identity attracted him to its ranks. Haider rapidly became
the leader of the FPÖ youth movement and quickly rose through the ranks. By
1979 he was the youngest parliamentary deputy ever in the Austrian Republic.


In the early 1980s Haider grew impatient with the party leadership, which he
regarded as too soft on immigration, wishy-washy on national identity or
sovereignty threatened from Brussels, and resigned to single-digit election
results. By 1983, after he became party chairman in the southern province of
Carinthia, Haider became openly critical of theaider FPÖ national
leadership. Three years later he staged a successful coup at the party
convention against its leader, Norbert Steger, a "moderate" who was at that
time Austria's vice-chancellor in coalition with the Socialists (SPÖ).
Haider's Young Turks were enthusiastic. The new spirit was captured in a
party activist's quip, "With Haider I'd march into Russia again, but with
Steger I would not even go on holiday." 

In 1989 Haider broke the Socialists' traditional hold on Carinthia by
winning 29 percent of the local vote, formed a coalition with the ÖVP, and
was elected Landeshauptmann (or governor) of the province. His tenure is
remembered mainly for a 1991 debate in the provincial assembly at Klagenfurt
that resulted in his resignation. A Socialist deputy attacked Haider's
scheme to cut unemployment payments for recipients he described as
"freeloaders," claiming it was similar to forced work placement in the Nazi
era. "It would not be like the Third Reich," Haider replied, "because the
Third Reich developed a proper employment policy, which your government in
Vienna has not once produced." In addition to causing Haider's resignation,
this exchange also prompted the ÖVP to swith partners and enter a coalition
with the SPÖ.

In the course of a national election campaign in 1995, Haider met a group of
SS veterans, of whom he said: "There are still decent people of good
character who also stick to their convictions, despite the greatest
opposition, and have remained true to their convictions until today." He
made a sudden U-turn on the issue of national identity during that same
campaign, however, announcing that pan-Germanism was finished and that he
was an "Austrian patriot." Somewhat bizzarely, at that time Haider also
described himself as a follower of Newt Gingrich, whose "Contract With
America" he used in his manifesto. The electorate was not enthused.

Four years later Haider focused on social issues and immigration – and
improved his party's standing dramatically, gaining 27 percent of the vote.
The FPÖ formed the ruling coalition with the People's Party, although Haider
himself was not a member of the new government (in early 1999 he was
re-elected the governor of Carinthia). The move nevertheless caused an
uproar in Brussels: the European Union decided to impose sanctions on
Austria even before the government had announced its program. "There is a
lot of excitement in the European chicken pen," Haider quipped, "and the fox
hasn't even got in." 

This episode merits some attention because it reveals in a raw form the mix
of authoritarianism and hypocrisy characteristic of Brussels. On January 31,
2000, the European Union informed Austria that it would face boycott if its
new government included the FPÖ. On February 4 Chancellor Schuessel
nevertheless went ahead and brought members of the Freedom Party into his
coalition. He was acting in full accord with the rules of parliamentary
democracy: the new government had a clear majority of 104 out of 183
parliamentary deputies. EU governments duly severed all bilateral political
contacts with the Austrian government.  They also restricted the promotion
of Austrians at EU headquarters and ignored Austrian ministers at EU
meetings. The measures also included ban on school trips, cultural exchanges
and military exercises. The U.S. joined the bandwagon and the State
Department called Ambassador Kathryn Hall back to Washington for
"consultations."

Although the measures had no impact on the lives of ordinary Austrians, they
triggered a backlash among the Austrian public. They also caused an outcry
in some smaller EU nations – notably Denmark – fearful of the domination of
more powerful members, such as France, which pushed for punitive measures.
For months thereafter the EU's Portuguese presidency maintained that the
sanctions would remain, but after the EU foreign ministers' Azores meeting
in June 2000 it was obvious that the embargo could not be sustained.

The EU sanctions were illegal because the decision to apply them was taken
outside the EU structures and without due process: the Austrian government
was not allowed have its point of view heard before the other members states
took action against it.  The EU action was doubly contentious in view of the
fact that Mr. Haider's party was democratically elected and had not done, or
even said, anything contrary to Austria's constitutional system or European
law. Even those Austrians not sympathetic to Haider came to believe that
EU's heavy-handedness was an insult to their country.

By that time Haider's ambiguous statements on the Third Reich had ceased to
be part of his politically operative vocabulary. On the other hand, his main
message – that there are too many foreigners in Austria and that immigration
threatens the country's economy and traditional ethnic composition – is even
more valid today than a decade ago.That message is now shared by two
parties. One of them (FPÖ) Haider led to national prominence; the other
(BZÖ) he created from scratch. They command 29 percent of the electorate
between them, but were unlikely to cooperate because of the bitter personal
animosity between Haider and the current FPÖ leader and former Haider
protégé Heinz-Christian Strache. Ironically, the Austrian nationalist Right
may be better poised to achieve unity that has eluded it for years now that
its poster boy is no longer with us.

"For us, it's the end of the world," a visibly distressed spokesman from
Haider's party, Stefan Petzner, told the press; "Joerg Haider was a
politician who changed the face of politics in this country." 

The end of the world it certainly is not: nearly 50 percent of under-30s now
support either Heider's original party or the one he founded three years ago
and led at the time of his death. Joerg Haider's legacy will live on for
many years to come.

Reply via email to