http://killinghope.org/bblum6/aer82.html

The Anti-Empire Report 
June 10th, 2010
by William Blum
www.killinghope.org

The worst thing that ever happened to the Jewish people is the Holocaust. The 
second worst thing that ever happened to the Jewish people is the state of 
Israel. 

Things internationally are so dispiriting there's nothing left to do but 
fantasize. I picture Turkey, as a member of NATO, demanding that the alliance 
come to its defense after being attacked by Israel. Under Article 5 of the NATO 
charter an armed attack on one member is deemed to constitute an armed attack 
on all members. That is the ostensible reason NATO is fighting in Afghanistan — 
the attack against the United States on September 11, 2001 is regarded as an 
attack on all NATO members (disregarding the awkward fact that Afghanistan as a 
country had nothing to do with the attack). The Israeli attack on a 
Turkish-flagged ship, operated by a Turkish humanitarian organization, killing 
nine Turkish nationals and wounding many more can certainly constitute an 
attack upon a NATO member.

So, after the United States, the UK, Germany, France and other leading NATO 
members offer their ridiculous non-sequitur excuses why they can't ... umm ... 
er ... invoke Article 5, and the international media swallows it all without 
any indigestion, Turkey demands that Israel should at least lose its formal 
association with NATO as a member of the Mediterranean Dialogue. This too is 
dismissed with scorn by the eminent NATO world powers on the grounds that it 
would constitute a victory for terrorism. And anti-Semitism of course.

Turkey then withdraws from NATO. Azerbaijan and five other Central Asian 
members of NATO's Partnership for Peace with Turkic constituencies do the same. 
NATO falls into a crisis. Remaining member countries begin to question the 
organization's policies as never before ... like please tell us again why our 
young men are killing and dying in Afghanistan, and why we send them to Kosovo 
and Iraq and other places the Americans deem essential to their 
endlessly-threatened national security.

When Vice President Biden tells the eminent conservative-in-liberal-clothing 
pseudo-intellectual Charlie Rose on TV that "We have put as much pressure and 
as much cajoling on Israel as we can to allow them [Gaza] to get building 
materials in," 1Rose for once rises to the occasion and acts like a real 
journalist, asking Biden: "Have you threatened Israel with ending all military 
and economic aid? ... Have you put the names of Israeli officials on your list 
of foreigners who can not enter the United States and whose bank accounts in 
the US are frozen, as you've done with numerous foreign officials who were not 
supporters of the empire? ... Since Israel has committed both crimes against 
the peace and crimes against humanity, and since these are crimes that have 
international jurisdiction, certain Israeli political and military personnel 
can be named in trials held in any country of the world. Will you be 
instructing the Attorney General to proceed with such
an indictment? Or if some other country which is a member of the International 
Criminal Court calls upon the ICC to prosecute these individuals, will the 
United States try to block the move? ... Why hasn't the United States itself 
delivered building materials to Gaza?"

When Israel justifies its murders on the grounds of "self-defense", late-night 
TV comedians Jay Leno and David Letterman find great humor in this, pointing 
out that a new memoir by China's premier at the time of the 1989 Tiananmen 
Square violent suppression defends the military action by saying that soldiers 
acted in "self-defense" when they fired on the democracy activists. 2

When Israel labels as "terrorists" the ship passengers who offered some 
resistance to the Israeli invaders, the New York Times points out that the 
passengers who resisted the 9-11 highjackers on the plane which crashed in 
Pennsylvania are called "heroes". (As an aside, it's worth noting that the 
United States uses 9-11 as Israel uses the Holocaust — as excuse and 
justification for all manner of illegal and violent international behavior.)

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reminds its readers that in 2009 Israel attacked 
a boat on international waters carrying medical aid to Gaza with former 
congresswoman Cynthia McKinney aboard; and that in 1967 Israel attacked an 
American ship, the USS Liberty, killing 34 and wounding about 173, and that 
President Johnson did then just what President Obama is doing now and would 
have done then — nothing.

And finally, Secretary of State Clinton declares that she's had a revelation. 
She realizes that what she recently said about North Korea when it was accused 
of having torpedoed a South Korean warship applies as well to Israel. Mrs. 
Clinton had demanded that Pyongyang "stop its provocative behavior, halt its 
policy of threats of belligerence towards its neighbors, and take irreversible 
steps to fulfill its denuclearization commitments and comply with international 
law." 3 She adds that the North Korean guilt is by no means conclusive, while 
Israel doesn't deny its attack on the ship at all; moreover, it's not known for 
sure if North Korea actually possesses nuclear weapons, whereas there's no 
uncertainty about Israel's large stockpile.

So there you have it. Hypocrisy reigns. Despite my best fantasizing. Is 
hypocrisy a moral failing or a failure of the intellect? When President Obama 
says, as he has often, "No one is above the law" and in his next breath makes 
it clear that his administration will not seek to indict Bush or Cheney for any 
crimes, does he think that no one will notice the contradiction, the hypocrisy? 
That's a callous disregard for public opinion and/or a dumbness worthy of his 
predecessor.

And when he declares: "The future does not belong to those who gather armies on 
a field of battle or bury missiles in the ground", 4does it not occur to him at 
all that he's predicting a bleak outlook for the United States? Or that his 
conscious, deliberate policy is to increase the size of America's army and its 
stockpile of missiles?

Comrades, can the hypocrisy and the lies reach such a magnitude that enough 
American true believers begin to question their cherished faith, so that their 
number reaches a critical mass and explodes? Well, it's already happened with 
countless Americans, but it's an awfully formidable task keeping pace with what 
is turned out by the mass media and education factories. They're awfully good 
at what they do. Too bad. But don't forsake the struggle. What better way is 
there to live this life? And remember, just because the world has been taken 
over by lying, hypocritical, mass-murdering madmen doesn't mean we can't have a 
good time.

Bad guys and good guys
In Lahore, Pakistan, reported the Washington Post on May 29, "Militants staged 
coordinated attacks ... on two mosques of a minority Muslim sect, taking 
hostages and killing at least 80 people. ... At least seven men armed with 
grenades, high-powered rifles and suicide vests stormed the mosques as Friday 
prayers ended."

Nice, really nice, very civilized. It's no wonder that decent Americans think 
that this is what the United States is fighting against — Islamic fanatics, 
homicidal maniacs, who kill their own kind over some esoteric piece of 
religious dogma, who want to kill Americans over some other imagined holy sin, 
because we're "infidels". How can we reason with such people? Where is the 
common humanity the naive pacifists and anti-war activists would like us to 
honor?

And then we come to the very last paragraph of the story: "Elsewhere in 
Pakistan on Friday, a suspected U.S. drone-fired missile struck a Taliban 
compound in the South Waziristan tribal area, killing eight, according to two 
officials in the region." This, we are asked to believe by our leaders, is a 
higher level of humanity. The United States does this every other day, sending 
robotic death machines called Predators flying over Afghanistan and Pakistan, 
to send Hellfire missiles screaming into wedding parties, funerals, homes, not 
knowing who the victims are, not caring who the victims are, many hundreds of 
them by now, as long as Washington can claim each time — whether correctly or 
not — that amongst their number was a prominent infidel, call him Taliban, or 
al Qaeda, or insurgent, or militant. How can one reason with such people, the 
ones in the CIA who operate the drone flights? What is the difference between 
them and a suicide bomber? The
suicide bomber becomes one of the victims himself and sees his victims up close 
before killing them. The CIA murderer bomber sits safely in a room in Nevada or 
California and pretends he's playing a video game, then goes out to dinner 
while his victims lay dying. The suicide bomber believes passionately in 
something called paradise. The murderer bomber believes passionately in 
something called flag and country. 

The State Department's Legal Advisor justifies the Predator bombings as ... 
yes, "self-defense". 5 Try reasoning with that.

These American drone bombings are of course the height of aggression, the 
ultimate international crime. They were used over Iraq as well beginning in the 
1990s. In December 2002, shortly before the US invasion in March, the Iraqis 
finally managed to shoot one down. This prompted a spokesman for the US Central 
Command, which oversees US military operations in the Middle East, to call it 
another sign of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's "campaign of military 
aggression." 6

This particular piece of hypocrisy may have actually been outdone by Secretary 
of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's comment about the US flights and bombings over 
Iraq during that period: "It bothers the dickens out of me that US and British 
pilots are getting fired at day after day after day, with impunity." 7

Send me a stamped self-addressed envelope for a copy of the revised edition of 
"An arsonist's guide to the homes of Pentagon officials".

When politicians misbehave. By speaking the truth.
The German president, Horst Koehler, resigned last week because he said 
something government officials are not supposed to say. He said that Germany 
was fighting in Afghanistan for economic reasons. No reference to democracy. 
Nothing about freedom. Not a word about Good Guys fighting Bad Guys. The word 
"terrorism" was not mentioned at all. Neither was "God". On a trip to German 
troops in Afghanistan he had declared that a country such as Germany, dependent 
on exports and free trade, must be prepared to use military force. The country, 
he said, had to act "to protect our interests, for example, free trade routes, 
or to prevent regional instability which might certainly have a negative effect 
on our trade, jobs and earnings". 

"Koehler has said something openly that has been obvious from the beginning," 
said the head of Germany's Left Party. "German soldiers are risking life and 
limb in Afghanistan to defend the export interests of big economic interests." 8

Other opposition politicians had called for Koehler to take back the remarks 
and accused him of damaging public acceptance of German military missions 
abroad. 9

As T.S. Eliot famously observed: "Humankind can not bear very much reality."

What is the opposite of being a conspiracy theorist?
David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker magazine and former Washington Post 
reporter, has a new book out, "The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama". 
In the three pages Remnick devotes to Obama's 1983-4 employment at Business 
International Corporation in New York he makes no mention of the well-known 
ties between BIC and the CIA. In 1977, for example, the New York Times revealed 
that BIC had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries during 
earlier years of the Cold War; 10BIC also attempted to penetrate the radical 
left, including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). 11

Did Remnick not think it at all interesting and worthy of mention that the 
future president worked for more than a year with a company that was a CIA 
asset? Even if the company and the CIA made no attempt to recruit Obama, which 
in fact they may have done? It's this kind of obvious omission that helps feed 
the left's conspiracy thinking.

Because Remnick has impeccable establishment credentials the book has been 
widely reviewed. But none of the many reviewers has seen fit to mention this 
omission. And the way it works of course is that if it's not mentioned, it 
didn't happen. And if you mention such a thing, you're a pathetic conspiracy 
theorist. Like me, who discussed it in the January edition of this report. 12

Spam, myself and my readers
As some of you now know, someone hacked into my website and used my address 
book to send out emails to many of the readers of this report. The emails 
indicated that they had been sent by me and directed people to a website which 
sells handbags, shoes and watches. What bothers me the most about this incident 
is that several of my readers believed that it was actually me who had sent out 
the emails, that I was peddling handbags, shoes and watches. The only thing I 
sell are books. But I think these readers have now learned something about 
spam. And hopefully about me.

Oh, by the way, can I interest any of you in some nice T-shirts, hats, or 
sunglasses?

Notes:

1. Charlie Rose Live, June 2, 2010 program ↩ 
2. Associated Press, June 4, 2010 ↩ 
3. State Department press conference, May 24, 2010 ↩ 
4. Talk given in Moscow, July 7, 2009, text released by the White House ↩ 
5. National Public Radio, March 26, 2010 ↩ 
6. Washington Post, December 24, 2002 ↩ 
7. Associated Press, September 30, 2002 ↩ 
8. London Times Online, May 31, 2010 ↩ 
9. Associated Press, May 31, 2010 ↩ 
10. New York Times, December 27, 1977, p.40 ↩ 
11. Carl Oglesby, "Ravens in the Storm: A Personal History of the 1960s Antiwar 
Movement" (2008), passim ↩ 
12. William Blum, The Anti-Empire Report, January 3rd, 2009 ↩ 
===========================



_______________________________________________
News mailing list
News@antic.org
http://lists.antic.org/mailman/listinfo/news

Reply via email to