* http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3733 *
<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=q2NlOuBaImWY2Od33WwysMFT8%2Bf7hCTG>
* Media Advisory
*
*FAIR Study: Media Blackout * *on Single-Payer Healthcare*
* Proponents of popular policy shut out of debate
3/6/09 *
* Major newspaper, broadcast and cable stories mentioning healthcare
reform in the week leading up to President Barack Obama's March 5
healthcare summit rarely mentioned the idea of a single-payer national
health insurance program, according to a new FAIR study. And advocates
of such a system--two of whom participated in yesterday's summit--were
almost entirely shut out, FAIR found.
Single-payer--a model in which healthcare delivery would remain largely
private, but would be paid for by a single federal health insurance fund
(much like Medicare provides for seniors, and comparable to Canada's
current system)--polls well with the public, who preferred it 59-to-32
over a privatized system in a recent survey (New York Times/CBS, **
1/11-15/09 *
<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=WHKu1DhciTrzO25otOKHh8FT8%2Bf7hCTG>*
). But a media consumer in the week leading up to the summit was more
likely to read about single-payer from the hostile perspective of
conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer than see an op-ed by a
single-payer advocate in a major U.S. newspaper.
Over the past week, hundreds of stories in major newspapers and on NBC
News, ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, NPR and PBS's NewsHour
With Jim Lehrer mentioned healthcare reform, according to a search of
the Nexis database (2/25/09-3/4/09). Yet all but 18 of these stories
made no mention of "single-payer" (or synonyms commonly used by its
proponents, such as "Medicare for all," or the proposed single-payer
bill, H.R. 676), and only five included the views of advocates of
single-payer--none of which appeared on television.
Of a total of 10 newspaper columns FAIR found that mentioned
single-payer, Krauthammer's syndicated column critical of the concept,
published in the Washington Post (2/27/09) and reprinted in four other
daily newspapers, accounted for five instances. Only three columns in
the study period advocated for a single-payer system (San Diego
Union-Tribune, 2/26/09; Boston Globe, 3/1/09; St. Petersburg Times, 3/3/09).
The FAIR study turned up only three mentions of single-payer on the TV
outlets surveyed, and two of those references were by TV guests who
expressed strong disapproval of it: conservative New York Times
columnist David Brooks (NewsHour, 2/27/09) and Republican congressman
Darrell Issa (MSNBC's Hardball, 2/26/09).
In many newspapers, the only argument in favor of the policy has been
made in letters to the editor (Oregonian, 2/28/09; USA Today, 2/26/09;
Washington Post, 3/4/09; Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/27/09; Atlanta Journal
Constitution, 2/26/09).
In contrast, the terminology of choice for detractors of any greater
public-sector role in healthcare--such as "socialized medicine" and
"government-run" healthcare--turned up seven times on TV, including once
on ABC News's This Week (3/1/09) and five times on CNN. CNN senior
medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen has herself adopted this
terminology in discussing healthcare reform, stating (CNN Newsroom,
2/26/09) that "if in time, Americans start to think what President Obama
is proposing is some kind of government-run health system--a la Canada,
a la England--he will get resistance in the same way that Hillary
Clinton got resistance when she tried to do tried to do this in the '90s."
Particularly in the absence of actual coverage of single-payer, such
rhetoric confuses rather than informs, blurring the differences between
the Canadian model of government-administered national health insurance
coupled with private healthcare delivery that single-payer proponents
advocate, and healthcare systems such as Britain's, in which healthcare
(and not just healthcare insurance) is administered by the government.
The views of CNN's senior medical correspondent notwithstanding, opinion
polling (e.g., ABC News/Washington Post, 10/9-19/03
<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=cif9NxaCvQR1EqAaG6fl9MFT8%2Bf7hCTG>
** ) suggests that the public would actually favor single-payer.
Though more than 60 lawmakers have co-sponsored H.R. 676, the
single-payer bill in Congress, Obama has not expressed support for
single-payer; both the idea and its advocates were marginalized in
yesterday's healthcare forum. But given the high level of popular
support the policy enjoys, that's all the more reason media should
include it in the public debate about the future of healthcare. *
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's
"News From Underground" newsgroup.
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
newsfromunderground-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com OR go to
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page.
For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- Begin Message ---
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<danielle_ho...@hotmail>
(reason: 550 Host unknown)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 5.1.2 <danielle_ho...@hotmail>... Host unknown (Name server: hotmail: host
not found)
Reporting-MTA: dns; mx5.nyu.edu
Received-From-MTA: DNS; H3.HOME.NYU.EDU
Arrival-Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:50:52 -0500 (EST)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; danielle_holke@hotmail
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; hotmail
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:50:53 -0500 (EST)
--- Begin Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=G94MrTxLxTCZQ6BE6OaiEcFT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=NMHQOCaY9kFN1EQmFT5zw8FT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=FBqjuGC00sEitv8a7pv0osFT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=g4vJWFBHRwyLFGKBgyRypsFT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=6LjIoxi0JeXtA+70+YoY9MFT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=3SNq1zKa6cqJTc+1aT/YLSuQ6aBmrkVq)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=0xh6hdovHBqnNx0oKZlXz8FT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ekY96Y9+RqaAQaEWZcV9aCuQ6aBmrkVq)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=sNowXZcGipw0NdeiPKrb9MFT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=DWEopaFLZ2WP0N91Q7LFpsFT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=KksmMRnw41knbtA2K/6kp8FT8+
f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=YqGhS/Y+NiZrkbL63xEvs8FT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=wzKf1igWs2vzLunF7+txI8FT8+f7hCTG)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=S3/dd07Gi2R47Q2oPgdm2cFT8+f7hCTG)
_http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3733_
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=q2NlOuBaImWY2Od33WwysMFT8+f7hCTG)
Media Advisory
FAIR Study: Media Blackout on Single-Payer Healthcare
Proponents of popular policy shut out of debate
3/6/09
Major newspaper, broadcast and cable stories mentioning healthcare reform
in the week leading up to President Barack Obama's March 5 healthcare summit
rarely mentioned the idea of a single-payer national health insurance program,
according to a new FAIR study. And advocates of such a system--two of whom
participated in yesterday's summit--were almost entirely shut out, FAIR found.
Single-payer--a model in which healthcare delivery would remain largely
private, but would be paid for by a single federal health insurance fund
(much
like Medicare provides for seniors, and comparable to Canada's current
system)--polls well with the public, who preferred it 59-to-32 over a
privatized
system in a recent survey (New York Times/CBS, _1/11-15/09_
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=WHKu1DhciTrzO25otOKHh8FT8+f7hCTG)
). But
a media consumer in the week leading up to the summit was more likely to read
about single-payer from the hostile perspective of conservative columnist
Charles Krauthammer than see an op-ed by a single-payer advocate in a major
U.S. newspaper.
Over the past week, hundreds of stories in major newspapers and on NBC News,
ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, NPR and PBS's NewsHour With Jim
Lehrer mentioned healthcare reform, according to a search of the Nexis
database (2/25/09-3/4/09). Yet all but 18 of these stories made no mention of
"single-payer" (or synonyms commonly used by its proponents, such as "Medicare
for
all," or the proposed single-payer bill, H.R. 676), and only five included
the views of advocates of single-payer--none of which appeared on television.
Of a total of 10 newspaper columns FAIR found that mentioned single-payer,
Krauthammer's syndicated column critical of the concept, published in the
Washington Post (2/27/09) and reprinted in four other daily newspapers,
accounted
for five instances. Only three columns in the study period advocated for a
single-payer system (San Diego Union-Tribune, 2/26/09; Boston Globe, 3/1/09;
St. Petersburg Times, 3/3/09).
The FAIR study turned up only three mentions of single-payer on the TV
outlets surveyed, and two of those references were by TV guests who expressed
strong disapproval of it: conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks
(NewsHour, 2/27/09) and Republican congressman Darrell Issa (MSNBC's Hardball,
2/26/09).
In many newspapers, the only argument in favor of the policy has been made
in letters to the editor (Oregonian, 2/28/09; USA Today, 2/26/09; Washington
Post, 3/4/09; Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/27/09; Atlanta Journal Constitution,
2/26/09).
In contrast, the terminology of choice for detractors of any greater
public-sector role in healthcare--such as "socialized medicine" and
"government-run"
healthcare--turned up seven times on TV, including once on ABC News's This
Week (3/1/09) and five times on CNN. CNN senior medical correspondent
Elizabeth Cohen has herself adopted this terminology in discussing healthcare
reform, stating (CNN Newsroom, 2/26/09) that "if in time, Americans start to
think
what President Obama is proposing is some kind of government-run health
system--a la Canada, a la England--he will get resistance in the same way that
Hillary Clinton got resistance when she tried to do tried to do this in the
'90s."
Particularly in the absence of actual coverage of single-payer, such
rhetoric confuses rather than informs, blurring the differences between the
Canadian
model of government-administered national health insurance coupled with
private healthcare delivery that single-payer proponents advocate, and
healthcare systems such as Britain's, in which healthcare (and not just
healthcare
insurance) is administered by the government.
The views of CNN's senior medical correspondent notwithstanding, opinion
polling (e.g., ABC News/Washington Post, _10/9-19/03_
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=cif9NxaCvQR1EqAaG6fl9MFT8+f7hCTG)
) suggests
that the public would actually favor single-payer.
Though more than 60 lawmakers have co-sponsored H.R. 676, the single-payer
bill in Congress, Obama has not expressed support for single-payer; both the
idea and its advocates were marginalized in yesterday's healthcare forum. But
given the high level of popular support the policy enjoys, that's all the
more reason media should include it in the public debate about the future of
healthcare.
Peace,
Liz
Liz Rich
lizrich...@aol.com
**************Need a job? Find employment help in your area.
(http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agencies&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000005)
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
