Here's some coverage much more forthright than the New York Times piece, which
played what happened as a sort of Rashomon-style 
exercise in multiple perspectives.

MCM


New York police attack protesting New School students

By Sandy English
13 April 2009

http://wsws.org/articles/2009/apr2009/news-a13.shtml

In a display of brutality, the New York City 
Police Department (NYPD) arrested 22 students who 
had occupied the premises of the New School in 
Manhattan's Greenwich Village last Friday. 
Students were struck by police without 
provocation and thrown to the ground, and others 
were pepper-sprayed.

Approximately 60 students occupied a New School 
building on Friday morning. The students were 
demanding the resignation of New School president 
Bob Kerrey, the former Nebraska governor and 
senator, and a Vietnam war criminal, as well as 
the school's autocratic executive vice president, 
James Murtha.

More than 20 police, wearing helmets, carrying 
plastic handcuffs, and wielding batons and 
pepper-spray, appeared at the school as the 
occupation began at about 5:30 a.m. Police 
presence increased throughout morning, as the 
police put up barriers and crime-scene tape to 
seal off the area.

Police vans and a truck from the Emergency 
Service Unit, the police unit that manages 
high-powered weapons and special siege and 
anti-riot tactics, appeared within a few hours. 
Soon, scores of police had surrounded the school 
building.

Emergency medical personnel and the Fire 
Department were also on hand. According to the 
New York Times, by 11:00 a.m. there were more 
than 100 police vehicles present and several 
mounted officers. Police helicopters circled 
overhead.

At about 11:30, police used bolt cutters to 
remove the chains used by the students to lock 
the doors and entered the building. They told the 
students to kneel on the ground and remove their 
backpacks. They were handcuffed one at a time.

As some of the students tried to exit by a side 
door in the building, police pepper-sprayed them 
and forced them back inside. Police chased down 
protesters on sidewalks near the school, striking 
some and throwing them to the ground, as videos 
by independent photographs have documented.

An NYPD spokesman, Paul J. Browne, denied 
pepper-spray or mace was used in the arrests, 
although, when later confronted with video 
evidence, he admitted that this had happened. 
Speaking of the unprovoked assault by one cop in 
attacking a protester, also caught on video, 
Brown told the media, "He pushed him and he fell 
down."

Students arrested face charges of burglary, riot 
and criminal mischief, and have been suspended 
from the New School pending administrative 
review. As the action was going on, President 
Kerrey announced that he no longer considered the 
protesters students.

On Friday evening, more than 200 people, most of 
them students, assembled at nearby Union Square 
to protest the police behavior. The group 
spontaneously began to march toward Kerrey's 
residence on 11th Street, but was turned back by 
police who arrested at least two of the 
demonstrators.

Donna Lieberman, executive director for the New 
York Civil Liberties Union, noted after viewing 
the video:

"What appears on the video is someone yelling at 
the cops and getting punched in the face for it 
and thrown to the ground and arrested. The Police 
Department has no authority to use physical force 
on somebody in this situation and they have no 
authority to arrest people for yelling at them; 
that is a violation of civil rights plain and 
simple."

The faculty union, ACT-UAW Local 7902, which 
represents more than 4,000 part-time and adjunct 
faculty at the New School and at nearby New York 
University, issued a statement that said in part 
that it "is gravely concerned with the Kerrey 
administration's harsh response to the New School 
students who recently occupied 65 Fifth Avenue, 
including a massive show of police force."

Bob Kerrey has been a highly controversial figure 
since his installation as the New School's 
president in 2001 because of his role in the 
Thanh Phong Massacre in Vietnam in February 1969.

That such a man could become the head of the New 
School, historically a left-leaning institution, 
whose faculty has included John Dewey, W.E.B. 
Dubois, James Baldwin and Hannah Arendt, was 
rightly seen by many students and faculty at the 
time as a travesty.

At the time, the World Socialist Web Site noted 
that Kerrey's appointment "testifies to the 
protracted decay of liberalism in the generation 
which has passed since conflicts over the Vietnam 
War rocked every college campus in America."

Kerrey's appointment as president of the New 
School reflected the debased political 
environment that would allow the US government to 
again embark on a mass killing in another small 
country in a few years time, this time in Iraq-a 
war that enjoyed Kerrey's vocal political support.

Kerrey's undemocratic methods of administration 
have made him an increasingly unpopular figure at 
the New School. In December, the New School 
Faculty senate passed a resolution of no 
confidence in him in a vote of 74-2.

Approximately 75 students occupied the building 
in December for 30 hours, also demanding the 
resignation of Kerrey, a greater say in the 
administration of the school and full disclosure 
of the school's investments. That occupation 
ended peacefully.

In a move typical of the Kerrey-Murtha 
administration, earlier this month 12 artists who 
teach part-time at the New School's Parsons 
School of Design were abruptly laid off without 
explanation via an e-mail message.

Most noteworthy in Friday's events was the 
excessive reaction and use of force by the NYPD 
against a small, peaceful occupation by the 
students. There can be no question that a 
decision was taken by the administration of Mayor 
Michael Bloomberg and the NYPD, in consultation 
with Bob Kerrey, to mobilize the police in a show 
of force totally disproportionate to the 
ostensible objective of removing a relative 
handful of students from a school building.

Behind this lies more than the organic hostility 
of New York's billionaire mayor and the former 
war criminal and establishment politician turned 
university president to the democratic rights of 
protesting students.

The deteriorating social conditions of the 
working class in New York City-a doubling of 
unemployment in a year, increased homelessness 
and use of food banks, evictions and 
foreclosures, together with employer demands for 
concessions and wage cuts-have created a volatile 
situation in which mass dissent by millions of 
workers could become the defining political 
feature in the city in the next few years.

The response of the city government has been to 
increase state-police methods of surveillance and 
repression. Already, the NYPD's notorious 
stop-and-frisks increased from 468,932 in 2007 to 
531,159 last year. The Center for Constitutional 
Rights (CCR) noted that more than 80 percent of 
those stopped are Latino or black. It is no 
secret that the vast majority of these are 
working class youth.

The CCR observed, "The remarkably low rates of 
NYPD initiated stops-and-frisks that result in 
arrests, summons, weapons and/or contraband 
yielded make evident the ineffectiveness of this 
unconstitutional practice."

NYPD behavior at demonstrations has become more 
violent and provocative in recent months, while 
the department has unveiled preparations for 
increasingly repressive measures.

At one of the January protests against the 
Israeli invasion of Gaza, police pepper-sprayed 
and beat protesters without provocation.

In February, the NYPD announced that it had begun 
training 130 additional cops in the use of 
semi-automatic rifles and "close quarter combat" 
at a training site in the Bronx that includes 
mock urban streets and buildings.

In March, the NYPD announced plans for a vast 
network of surveillance cameras in Midtown 
Manhattan. The system would collect data such as 
license plate numbers of vehicles and video of 
pedestrians, and would duplicate the security 
system already being installed in Lower Manhattan.

According to the New York Times, the so-called 
Lower Manhattan Security Initiative would include 
"mobile teams of heavily armed officers as well 
as closed-circuit television cameras, license 
plate readers and explosive trace detection 
systems." More than 3,000 network cameras would 
be used.

The NYPD has also proposed a program known as 
Operation Sentinel in which every vehicle 
entering Manhattan would have its license plate 
photographed and scanned.

The author also recommends:

<http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/kerr-m04.shtml>Robert 
Kerrey and the bloody legacy of Vietnam
[4 May 2001]

<http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/mar2007/nypd-m28.shtml>New 
York police conducted massive international 
spying on anti-Bush demonstrators
[March 28, 2007]

<http://www.wsws.org/about.shtml>About the WSWS | 
<http://www.wsws.org/wsws/dd-formmailer/dd-formmailer.php>Contact 
Us | <http://www.wsws.org/privacy.shtml>Privacy 
Statement | 
<http://www.wsws.org/tools/index.php?page=print&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsws.org%2Farticles%2F2009%2Fapr2009%2Fnews-a13.shtml#>Top
 
of page

Copyright © 1998-2009 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
newsfromunderground-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to