I got this rather late, so there's no time to lose.

MCM

FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
<http://www.FluorideAlert.Org>http://www.FluorideAlert.Org

URGENT:
Help fight more Dow/EPA fraud!

July 10, 2009,

We need your help before midnight tonight, if we are to prevent more 
fluoride exposure to our population and more fraud at the EPA.

Introduction

Many of us had hoped (and believed) that when Obama took office he 
would restore scientific integrity to the regulatory agencies. In 
particular, we had hoped that he would rescue the EPA pesticide 
division from the stranglehold influence of the chemical industry. 
One way that this could have been demonstrated would have been to 
have put a hold on Dow AgroSciences use of the fumigant sulfuryl 
fluoride on foodstuffs in warehouses and processing plants. Such use 
leaves very high levels of fluoride on many foods, at a time when it 
is clear that the US population is already being grossly over-exposed 
to fluoride. Even the CDC admits that over 30% of American kids have 
dental fluorosis, which is scientific evidence of over-exposure to 
fluoride (CDC, 2005).

For over 5 years FAN has been intervening in EPA's permitting process 
and has clearly demonstrated the fraudulent manipulation of the data 
contained in the health risk assessments performed by EPA in this 
process. The health risk assessment was redone twice by the EPA in an 
attempt to get around the fact that FAN had shown that infants were 
already exceeding the safe reference dose (dosage) of 0.114 mg per kg 
bodyweight per day, and thus no new source should be permitted. 
Rather than acknowledging this, the EPA TWICE raised the reference 
dose for infants. First, to 0.561 mg/kg/day and then to 1.14 
mg/kg/day. The latest safe reference dose for infants is now TEN 
times higher than the safe reference dose for adults. Such a 
contention not only defies common sense and basic toxicological 
principles but also the mandates of the Food Quality and Protection 
Act (FQPA), which requires that an extra safety factor be applied to 
protect infants and young children from pesticide residues in risk 
assessments because of their known extra sensitivity to toxic 
substances during early development. Thus, if anything the reference 
dose should have been set lower for infants than adults, not TEN 
times higher!

Ironically, even the reference dose for adults (0.114 mg/kg/day) is 
in doubt because it's based upon the EPA's safe drinking water 
standard of 4 ppm which the National Research Council panel has 
stated is not protective of health (NRC 20060.

The EPA has simply refused to explain these horrendous manipulations. 
Instead, they offered to participate in a mediation process. But this 
has simply been a huge delaying tactic. We had naively hoped that 
they were delaying the process until a more friendly administration 
was in place. Thus, we were shocked to discover that before the EPA 
had responded to our critique of their unscientific health risk 
assessment(s), and our appeal that the use of sulfuryl fluoride be 
halted pending such an explanation, that the EPA is now considering 
allowing Dow AgroSciences to extend the use of sulfuryl fluoride as a 
pre-plant soil fumigant!

How you can help fight this

Fortunately, the Sierra Club has intervened on this expanded use of 
sulfuryl fluoride because of the fact that sulfuryl fluoride is a 
very potent Greenhouse gas, contributing to Global warming. They have 
set up the machinery for people to send in comments to the EPA on 
this. We request that you piggy back on this machinery and add a 
comment to the effect:

"Not only am I concerned about sulfuyrl fluoride's global warming 
potential but I am also very concerned that the EPA is considering 
expanding the use of this highly toxic fumigant before it has 
addressed the charges raised by the Fluoride Action Network that the 
health risk assessments that they performed for Dow were outrageously 
manipulated to yield a safe reference dose for infants (1.14 
mg/kg/day) which is TEN times higher than the reference dose for 
adults (0.114 mg/kg/day). Such a manipulation defies common sense and 
basic toxicological principles but also the mandates of the Food 
Quality and Protection Act (FQPA), which requires that an extra 
safety factor be applied to protect infants and young children from 
pesticides because of their known extra sensitivity to toxic 
substances during early development.

I thought with he election of President Obama we were going to get 
more scientific integrity at the EPA, instead we are getting more 
poison for our kids! They are already being over-exposed to fluoride 
- they don't need any more. Don't let this travesty happen."

<https://secure2.convio.net/sierra/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=2545&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr011=kmutt74ot1.app17a>Click
 
here to sign SIERRA'S PETITION 

Don't forget that this has to be done before MIDNIGHT July 10. It 
doesn't matter what country you live in.  Please get your friends to 
do the same.

Many thanks

Paul Connett

PS:  please let us know if you sign the petition so we can get some 
idea of the numbers.

###

To unsubscribe from these bulletins, click on the following link:
<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2477/unsubscribe.jsp 
>http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2477/unsubscribe.jsp


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
newsfromunderground-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to