<http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/08/11/emails-show-washington-post-reporter-coordinated-attorney-firing-story-with-white-house/>Emails
 
show Washington Post reporter coordinated 
attorney firing story with White House


By <http://rawstory.com/08/news/author/murielkane/>Muriel Kane

Published: August 11, 2009
Updated 4 hours ago



When a scandal involving the Bush 
administration's firing of US Attorneys broke in 
early 2007, initial coverage by the Washington 
Post supported the idea that the firings had been 
politically motivated. That approach, however, 
quickly changed to one that was far more friendly 
to the White House.

The House Judiciary Committee has now released 
over 5400 pages of Bush administration and 
Republican Party 
<http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/WHDocsPT10.pdf>emails 
(pdf) related to the firings. Several of these 
emails suggest coordination between Post reporter 
John Solomon and Bush administration officials on 
how to manage the Post's coverage of the widening 
scandal.

In one email to a Department of Justice 
spokesperson, Solomon even appears to be 
suggesting what spin to apply in order to 
minimize damage from the revelations.

"Thanks for any help you can give on this," 
Solomon wrote to Brian Roehrkasse on the morning 
of March 2, 2007. "I think some tick tock along 
these lines will bring some perspective to how 
the process occurred. Of course, the White House 
counsel's office had to sign off. Of course an 
administration in its last two years looks for 
some fresh blood to inject into jobs. Of course, 
DOJ's analysis of prosecutors goes beyond 
performance evaluations to achievements or 
failures on policy issues like immigration. I 
think we can get this just right with your help."

Solomon, who had gone to work for the Post just a 
few months earlier, in December 2006, left that 
paper to become executive editor of the 
conservative-leaning Washington Times in January 
2008.

On March 1, the day before Solomon's email, the 
Washington Post had published a story by writer 
Dan Eggen, 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801502_pf.html>reporting
 
allegations by the departing US Attorney in New 
Mexico, David Iglesias, that "two members of 
Congress attempted to pressure him to speed up a 
probe of Democrats just before the November 
elections."

"I didn't give them what they wanted," Iglesias 
explained. "That was probably a political problem 
that caused them to go to the White House or 
whomever and complain that I wasn't a team 
player."

In response, the House and Senate Judiciary 
Committees had announced "that they would issue 
subpoenas for testimony from Iglesias and other 
fired prosecutors if necessary."

The next day, as administration officials 
frantically tried to figure out how to minimize 
the damage, Solomon wrote to White House 
spokesperson Dana Perino.

"I've been asked to help out Dan Eggen for a day 
on the prosecutor purge story and I got some 
interesting details this morning I'd like to run 
by you," Solomon told Perino. "It illuminates the 
White House role, which has been absent from the 
media coverage but is the true target for the 
upcoming congressional hearings by Democrats. Š 
I'll go over everything I've been told and see 
what we can get formally confirmed."

Solomon's email to Roehrkasse, indicating the 
approach he intended to take, followed about an 
hour later.
Discussion of the proposed article then continued 
among White House officials throughout the 
afternoon, with particular objections being 
raised over Solomon's description of the firings 
as part of "a much larger process that began at 
the start of 2006 when White House political 
affairs under Sara Taylor identified several GOP 
supporters who still needed appointments across 
government before Bush left office."

"I have no recollection of any such list," Taylor 
wrote to Perino, Rove and others. And Rove 
himself chimed in to say,
"He has been told the wrong thing."

When the 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/02/AR2007030201949_pf.html>story
 
appeared the next day under the joint byline of 
John Solomon and Dan Eggen, it contained no 
mention of a list of replacements. Instead, it 
merely cited unnamed administration officials as 
stating that "the list of prosecutors was 
assembled last fall, based largely on complaints 
from members of Congress, law enforcement 
officials and career Justice Department lawyers."

According to those officials, the firings were 
not purely "performance-related," as the White 
House had previously attempted to claim, but came 
out of "a decision to pick the prosecutors we 
felt would most effectively carry out the 
department's policies and priorities."

The Bush administration's satisfaction with 
Solomon's story can be seen in an exchange of 
<http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:-L92WJ_9imcJ:judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/OAG1235-1237.pdf+%22White+House+Backed+U.S.+Attorney+Firings,+Officials+Say%22&hl=en&gl=us>emails
 
on the day of its publication.

"This is not an entirely accurate picture of what 
happened, but I think this story is far better 
than most recent post stories on this subject," 
Brian Roehrkasse wrote.

And Kyle Sampson - the counselor to then-Attorney 
General Alberto Gonzales who would be forced to 
resign just nine days later for his role in the 
scandal - responded, "Great work, Brian. Kudos to 
you and the DAG."

By "DAG," Sampson was apparently referring to 
Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, who had 
been central to the claims that the firings were 
performance-related and that the White House had 
played little role in them. Gonzales would admit 
on March 13 that McNulty's testimony before the 
Senate Judiciary Committee had been incorrect.

(with additional research by Ron Brynaert)



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
newsfromunderground-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<attachment: image001 378.jpg>>

Reply via email to