BIOTECHNOLOGY
<https://www.independentsciencenews.org/sections/biotechnology/>, HEALTH
<https://www.independentsciencenews.org/sections/health/>, NEWS
<https://www.independentsciencenews.org/sections/news/> AUGUST 13, 2020
Engineered COVID-19-Infected Mouse Bites Researcher Amid ‘Explosion’ Of
Risky Coronavirus Research

*by Jonathan Latham, PhD*


https://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/engineered-covid-19-
infected-mouse-bites-researcher-amid-explosion-of-
risky-coronavirus-research/

*University researchers genetically engineer a human pandemic virus. They
inject the new virus into a laboratory mouse. The infected mouse then bites
a researcher…..It is a plot worthy of a Hollywood blockbuster about risky
coronavirus research.*

*But according to newly obtained minutes of the Institutional Biosafety
Committee
<https://2f7nhsvfj5dyz0312njuuj14-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/For-Production-to-Requestor-IBC-Meeting-Minutes.pdf>
(IBC)
of the University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill, these exact events
need not be imagined. They occurred for real between April 1st and May 6th
this year.*

*The identity of the bitten coronavirus researcher has not been revealed
except that they were working in a high security BSL-3 virus lab when the
accident happened.*

*According to Richard Ebright <https://www.waksman.rutgers.edu/ebright>, an
epidemiologist from Rutgers University, the UNC incident underscores an
important development in virus research since the pandemic began:*

*“There has been an explosion of research involving fully infectious
SARS-CoV-2 over the last six months.  Research with infectious SARS-CoV-2
now is occurring in every, or almost every, BSL-3 facility in the US and
overseas.”*

*This strong upsurge
<https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/15/844752/biologists-rush-to-re-create-the-china-coronavirus-from-its-dna-code/>
is
affirmed by Edward Hammond of Prickly Research, Austin, TX, former Director
of the Sunshine Project, an NGO that tracked the post 9/11 expansion of the
US Biodefense program.*

*“It is evident that swarms of academic researchers with little prior
experience with coronaviruses have leapt into the field in recent months.”*

*For Hammond, this explosion represents a hazard:*

*“We need to be clear headed about the risk. The first SARS virus was a
notorious source of laboratory-acquired infections and there is a very real
risk that modified forms of SARS-CoV-2 could infect researchers, especially
inexperienced researchers, with unpredictable and potentially quite
dangerous results. The biggest risk is the creation and accidental release
of a novel form of SARS-CoV-2 — a variant whose altered characteristics
might undermine global efforts to stop the pandemic by evading the
approaches being taken to find COVID vaccines and treatments.”*

*And, continues Hammond: “Each additional lab that experiments with CoV-2
amplifies the risk.”*

*Richard Ebright concurs, telling Independent Science News in an email that
this research is:*

*“in many cases being performed by researchers who have no prior experience
in BSL-3 operations and pathogens research, and who therefore pose elevated
risk of laboratory accidents with BSL-3 pathogens.”*

*Ebright is also concerned that some influential experimenters are now
calling for reduced oversight :*

*“The UNC incident also underscores that calls by some, notably Columbia
University virologist Vincent Racaniello
<https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-620/> (Podcast at 01:35mins onwards), to
allow virus-culture and virus-production research with fully infectious
SARS-CoV-2 at BSL-2 are egregiously irresponsible and absolutely
unacceptable.”*

*Other researchers are also calling for restraint. In a paper titled
“Prudently conduct the engineering and synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus”,
researchers from China and the US critiqued the synthesis in February of a
full length infectious clone (Gao et al., 2020
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405805X20300193>; Thao
et al., 2020
<https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2020/02/21/2020.02.21.959817.full.pdf>).
And, in concluding, these researchers asked a question that is even more
pertinent now
<https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/the-case-is-building-that-covid-19-had-a-lab-origin/>
than
then “Once the risks [of a lab escape] become a reality, who or which
organization should take responsibility for them?”*

*Click on the link for the rest.*

-- 
If you appreciate News From Underground, please consider making a donation — 
either a one-time gift or a monthly subscription: 
http://markcrispinmiller.com/support/
Thank you for your support.

Ways to unsubscribe:
1) send a blank email to newsfromunderground+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
PLEASE NOTE: you must unsubscribe using the SAME email with which you subscribed

2) go to http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page.

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "News 
From Underground" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to newsfromunderground+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/newsfromunderground/CAGxB6W-4WiDuTWGT03ihrXhtGfOesVS7n%2BbR9hBg1f%3DyZ2aLpQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to