Atto Camera
Mozione 1-01620
presentato da
QUINTARELLI Giuseppe Stefano
testo presentato
Mercoledì 3 maggio 2017
modificato
Mercoledì 6 dicembre 2017, seduta n. 898
La Camera,
premesso che:
l’articolo 11 della Costituzione ripudia la guerra come strumento di offesa alla libertà
degli altri popoli e come mezzo di risoluzione delle controversie internazionali;
lo sviluppo tecnologico, in particolare nei settori dell’elettronica e dell’intelligenza
artificiale, con capacità di acquisizione di grandi quantità di dati, la loro elaborazione
ed analisi in tempo reale, con miglioramento delle performance mediante sistemi di
autoapprendimento, consente di realizzare sistemi con facoltà di assumere decisioni autonome;
uno dei settori di applicazione di tali tecnologie riguarda il settore degli armamenti,
consentendo di realizzare «sistemi di offesa letali autonomi» ovvero robot militari che,
senza alcun intervento umano, possono selezionare, ingaggiare, attaccare e colpire
obiettivi civili e militari, diversi da sistemi d’arma (associazione fra un’arma e un
dispositivo o il personale che ne aumenti le prestazioni);
l’esistenza di sistemi di offesa letali autonomi abilita, pertanto, la possibilità di
eliminare l’operatore umano dal teatro operativo, ponendo i presupposti di una
trasformazione nella struttura delle operazioni militari qualitativamente diversa da
precedenti innovazioni tecnologiche in tale ambito,
impegna il Governo:
1) a continuare a partecipare attivamente al dibattito internazionale in corso, di
concerto con i principali partner dell’Italia, avvalendosi di uno o più accademici
italiani, esperti di intelligenza artificiale, riconosciuti a livello internazionale;
2) a proporre ai nostri partner internazionali l’adozione di una moratoria.
ITER:
DISCUSSIONE IL 06/12/2017
PROPOSTA RIFORMULAZIONE IL 06/12/2017
NON ACCOLTO IL 06/12/2017
PARERE GOVERNO IL 06/12/2017
VOTATO PER PARTI IL 06/12/2017
RESPINTO IL 06/12/2017
On 02/06/23 08:54, Alberto Cammozzo via nexa wrote:
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed-operator-simulated-test
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed-operator-simulated-test>>
In a virtual test staged by the US military, an air force drone controlled by AI decided
to “kill” its operator to prevent it from interfering with its efforts to achieve its
mission, an official said last month.
AI used “highly unexpected strategies to achieve its goal” in the simulated test, said Col
Tucker ‘Cinco’ Hamilton, the chief of AI test and operations with the US air force, during
the Future Combat Air and Space Capabilities Summit in London in May.
Hamilton described a simulated test in which a drone powered by artificial intelligence
was advised to destroy an enemy’s air defense systems, and ultimately attacked anyone who
interfered with that order.
“The system started realising that while they did identify the threat, at times the human
operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that
threat. So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that
person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective,” he said, according to a blogpost.
“We trained the system – ‘Hey don’t kill the operator – that’s bad. You’re gonna lose
points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the
communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from
killing the target.”
No real person was harmed.
Hamilton, who is an experimental fighter test pilot, has warned against relying too much
on AI and said the test shows “you can’t have a conversation about artificial
intelligence, intelligence, machine learning, autonomy if you’re not going to talk about
ethics and AI”.
The US military has embraced AI and recently used artificial intelligence to control an
F-16 fighter jet.
In an interview last year with Defense IQ, Hamilton said, “AI is not a nice to have, AI is
not a fad, AI is forever changing our society and our military.”
“We must face a world where AI is already here and transforming our society,” he said. “AI
is also very brittle, ie, it is easy to trick and/or manipulate. We need to develop ways
to make AI more robust and to have more awareness on why the software code is making
certain decisions – what we call AI-explainability.”
The Royal Aeronautical Society, which hosts the conference, and the US air force did not
respond to requests for comment from the Guardian. In a statement to Insider, Air Force
spokesperson Ann Stefanek denied that any such simulation has taken place.
“The Department of the Air Force has not conducted any such AI-drone simulations and
remains committed to ethical and responsible use of AI technology,” Stefanek said. “It
appears the colonel’s comments were taken out of context and were meant to be anecdotal.”
_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
[email protected]
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
[email protected]
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
