On mer, 2024-06-19 at 11:34 +0200, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote: > Beh, il pamphlet di Harry Franfurt è stato tradotto in italiano col titolo: > "Stronzate. Un saggio filosofico".
Un link? > On 19/06/24 11:28, Franco Marra wrote: > > > Molto interessante, grazie. Io di solito per "bullshit" intendo "stronzate". > > A mo' di verifica ho chiesto di tradurre il termine al traduttore Google. La > > risposta è stata "cazzate". Se lo dice lui... > > > > Il giorno mer 19 giu 2024 alle ore 10:51 J.C. DE MARTIN > > <juancarlos.demar...@polito.it> ha scritto: > > > > > ChatGPT is bullshit > > > > > > Michael Townsen Hicks1 · James Humphries1 · Joe Slater1 > > > > > > Abstract > > > Recently, there has been considerable interest in large language models: > > > machine learning systems which produce human- like text and dialogue. > > > Applications of these systems have been plagued by persistent inaccuracies > > > in their output; these are often called “AI hallucinations”. We argue that > > > these falsehoods, and the overall activity of large language models, is > > > better understood as bullshit in the sense explored by Frankfurt (On > > > Bullshit, Princeton, 2005): the models are in an important way indifferent > > > to the truth of their outputs. We distinguish two ways in which the models > > > can be said to be bullshitters, and argue that they clearly meet at least > > > one of these definitions. We further argue that describing AI > > > misrepresentations as bullshit is both a more useful and more accurate way > > > of predicting and discussing the behaviour of these systems. > > > > > > https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5 > > > > > > Hicks, M.T., Humphries, J. & Slater, J. ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics Inf > > > Technol 26, 38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5 > > > * Published 08 June 2024 > > > * DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5 > > > >
