Il 23/01/25 12:00 PM, alessandro marzocchi ha scritto:
In concreto, cosa suggerisci?

Dico la mia, pur non chiamato in causa.

Mi sembra un tempismo perfetto per, ad esempio, stilare un sintetico "manifesto" (1 x A4) che NEXA (il Centro NEXA), supportato dai membri della sua community (chi, in questa lista, vuole metterci nome e cognome), indirizza principalmente a tutti gli Enti di Ricerca (in primis, Atenei [....perché hanno 'studenti'; non per altro]) proponendo loro, sulla falsariga di quanto fatto altrove, in Europa, di abbandonare i social USA + tirare su istanze mastodon dedicate (vedi esperienza di SURF, in Olanda), offrendosi di supportate l'installazione dei software (attraverso tool di automazione open-source e ultra-collaudati) e, in subordine, di supportare i tecnici periferici nel setup materiale.

Chiaramente Nexa dovrebbe eliminare i propri account e... far partire un'istanza mastodon....preliminarmente... altrimenti la cosa non ha molto senso (tendenzialmente, qui, siamo fra persone serie e coerenti. Quindi, predicare bene e razzolare male, non è una opzione).

Vantaggi: ne vedo tantissimi.

Rischi: praticamente nessuno.

Se tutto va bene: abbiamo fatto goal.

Se tutto va male... abbiamo buttato un po' di tempo, senza conseguenze (e comunque, un epsilon del tempo passato a processare la lista...)

Follia?

Saluti,
DV

Cordialmente, Duccio

Il giorno gio 23 gen 2025 alle ore 11:44 Marco A. Calamari <[email protected]> ha scritto:

    On gio, 2025-01-23 at 11:29 +0100, alessandro marzocchi wrote:
    Concordo: *c**i vuole un modello di sviluppo europeo ben
    supportato da politiche einvestimenti.*

    Buongiorno a tutti.

    E' vero, sognare è lecito e comprensibile.

    Ma in realtà bisogna invece semplicemente  prepararsi al peggio,
    cercando di prevederlo per limitare i danni.

    Altrimenti significa delirio di onnipotenza....

    JM2C.   Marco


    Cordialmente, Duccio (Alessandro Marzocchi)
    PS
    c'è già chi ha mandato Trump a quel paese [1], l'europarlamentare
    di estrema destra Anders Vistisen[2]
    
[1]https://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2025/01/22/video/anders_vistisen_eurodeputato_danese_insulta_trump_alleuroparlamento-423954612/
    [2]https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875/ANDERS_VISTISEN/home

    Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:06:20 +0100
    From: Guido Vetere <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [nexa] Trump lauds $500BN ‘Stargate’ AI project and
            slashes Biden tech regulations - The Washington Post

    C'è qualcuno - namely: Altman - perfino più pazzo di Musk.
    Immaginiamo che spendano tutti i dollari del mondo in un datacenter
    grosso come la Groenlandia (dopo l'annessione).
    Alla fine cosa otterranno? I limiti della ragione, umana o
    automatica
    che sia, sono invalicabili tanto quanto quelli fisici.
    L'umanità consiste proprio nello stare dentro questi limiti, ed
    anche
    l'AI è utile finché li rispetta.
    Questo è il momento buono per mandare gli yankee pazzi a quel paese.
    Certo, ci vorrà qualcosa di più di quel ditino alzato che si
    chiama AI Act.
    Ci vorrà un modello di sviluppo europeo ben supportato da
    politiche e
    investimenti.

    Buona giornata,
    G.

    On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 14:25, Alberto Cammozzo via nexa
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Trump’s AI policy moves on his first two days in office and
    remarks at the White House on Tuesday showed him positioning
    himself as a strong supporter of the U.S. tech industry — while
    turning away from the Biden administration’s stance that AI
    technology requires both support and oversight. Biden’s
    executive order, some of which has been implemented by changes
    at federal agencies, focused on preventing risks such as
    algorithms that spread bias or AI assistants that could help
    terrorists build bioweapons.
    >
    > “AI seems to be very hot,” Trump said at the White House on
    Tuesday. “It seems to be the thing that a lot of smart people
    are looking at very strongly.”
    >
    > Trump was joined by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Oracle Chairman
    Larry Ellison and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son who announced
    “Stargate,” a joint venture that will seek to spend as much as
    $500 billion over the next four years to build as many as 20 new
    data centers to support AI projects.
    >
    > The warehouselike facilities, stuffed with thousands of
    powerful and electricity-guzzling computer chips, are essential
    to developing and running AI software like that behind ChatGPT.
    A boom in data center construction is straining the power grid
    in states across the United States as companies including
    Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta have spent billions of
    dollars on new facilities. But AI leaders such as Altman say
    many more of the facilities must be built for AI technology to
    keep advancing.
    >
    > “I think this will be the most important project of this era,”
    Altman said at the White House on Tuesday. “We wouldn’t be able
    to do this without you, Mr. President,” he said, turning to
    Trump. Son said that SoftBank decided to move ahead with the
    Stargate project because of Trump’s election victory.
    >
    > The $500 billion doesn’t include money from the federal
    government, according to a person familiar with the project who
    spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe plans that
    haven’t been made public. In addition to the companies creating
    Stargate, Dubai investment firm MGX, an investor in OpenAI, will
    contribute funding to the project. Microsoft and semiconductor
    manufacturers ARM and Nvidia will provide technology, OpenAI
    said in an announcement.
    >
    > Trump’s industry-friendly first moves on tech policy were not
    unexpected.
    >
    > OpenAI has been working on Stargate for months, and its CEO
    Altman had been pitching politicians on the idea of a major push
    to build up AI infrastructure a year ago.
    >
    > Prominent Silicon Valley executives and investors, including
    some who contributed to Trump’s reelection, had long railed
    against President Joe Biden’s executive order instituting
    guardrails for AI technology.
    >
    > Although certain industry leaders like Altman said some
    regulation was necessary, critics said the government would only
    get in the way of the technology’s development and prevent
    smaller, younger companies from being able to compete with more
    established ones. Months before the election, Trump allies were
    already drafting an executive order of their own that would
    review “unnecessary” regulations and launch “Manhattan Projects”
    to develop military technology.
    >
    > Despite Trump’s more industry-friendly approach to AI, his
    emerging policy is not a complete reversal of his predecessor’s.
    Biden in the final days of his administration directed federal
    agencies to speed up the development of AI data center projects
    on federal land.
    >
    > Trump said on Tuesday that he supported that policy. “That
    sounds to me like it’s something that I would like. I’d like to
    see federal lands opened up for data centers. I think they’re
    going to be very important,” he said.
    >
    > Netchoice, a lobbying group with members including Google,
    Meta and Amazon, welcomed Trump repeal of the Biden-era AI
    rules. “His orders rolling back regulations on U.S. energy
    production and ending Biden’s artificial intelligence (AI) red
    tape wishlist are critical for America’s global leadership in
    technological development,” Netchoice said in a post on X.
    Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.
    >
    > Proponents of AI regulation have argued that it is needed not
    only to ward off potential harms from the technology but also to
    support its economic development and adoption by providing
    people with confidence that AI is safe to use.
    >
    > “A politically-motivated repeal with no thoughtful replacement
    is self-defeating for our country and dangerous for our people
    and the world,” Alondra Nelson, a senior fellow at the Center
    for American Progress, a liberal think tank, who also worked on
    technology policy in the Biden administration, said in a
    statement. “This will leave the American public unprotected from
    the risks and harms of AI and, therefore, unable to take up the
    benefits it might bring.”
    >
    > Deborah Raji, a Mozilla fellow and AI researcher at the
    University of California at Berkeley, said that the repeal of
    Biden’s executive order, in combination with the Supreme Court
    curbing federal agencies’ power to set and institute regulations
    last year and Trump’s ambitions to empower business leaders,
    create a “Wild West era” for AI products. “They’re going to be
    empowered to build models and throw them everywhere, without a
    lot of regard to safety,” she said.
    >
    > AI companies have been spending huge amounts of money buying
    computer chips and building new data centers to house them. The
    surge in data center construction has also pushed up estimates
    for how much electricity the U.S. will need to generate to power
    them, leading to some coal power plants that had been slated to
    be closed to be kept online.



--
    Marco A. Calamari <[email protected]>

--
Damiano Verzulli
e-mail:[email protected]
---
possible?ok:while(!possible){open_mindedness++}
---
"...I realized that free software would not generate the kind of
income that was needed. Maybe in USA or Europe, you may be able
to get a well paying job as a free software developer, but not
here [in Africa]..." -- Guido Sohne - 1973-2008
   http://ole.kenic.or.ke/pipermail/skunkworks/2008-April/005989.html

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to