> To my knowledge, the IPFIX tags list also include netflow v9 tags regardless > whether they are used or not and whether > they make sense or not. So you will find any v9 tags in the IPFIX table also > 21,22. They are used in v9. The sysupTime > itself is transferred in the v9 header. So the collector can calculate the > absolute time stamps. However, this sysupTime > does not exists in IPFIX, neither as tag nor in the header. IPFIX and and > netflow v9 have different headers. The > collector is therefore unable to display start/stop time stamps. Instead of > relative time stamps 21,22 your device > should use absolute time stamps 152,153 which are common in IPFIX. > > Hope, that helps.
That does help. Thank you. One follow-up question; would this also explain why nfdump is reporting 0 for the bps and pps fields? - Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Nfdump-discuss mailing list Nfdump-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss
