Of course, that makes sense.  I hadn't noticed that the output included
two ifindex lines that weren’t specified in the query (642,635) which are
the second interfaces that the flows pass through. Your reply made me take
a closer look at the output to see what was actually there and not what I
expected to be there. :)

Thank you Peter.

-paul


On 10/10/14, 12:34 AM, "Peter Haag" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Paul,
>It looks to me ok. The filter does not matter. Your statistics is about
>interfaces. The same traffic flows through two interface - in/out.
>The stat counts each interface individually and therefore counts twice
>the numbers in the summary.
>
>Hope that helps
>
>- Peter
>
>On 08/10/14 17:40, Wefel, Paul wrote:
>> Hello all, 
>> 
>> I searched the archives for this issue and found references to byte
>>total discrepancies but I didn’t find anything like what I am seeing.
>> With this query, the returned bytes and packet count summary is exactly
>>half of the total of the returned flows.
>> I have tried this on nfdump 1.6.12 and 1.6.10 with the same result.  I
>>suspect something in the query may be wrong and I’m not seeing it.
>> Anyone have any ideas?  Thanks.
>> 
>> nfdump -M /a/flowdata/exit_east/2014/07 -R . -N  -s if/bytes '((port =
>>5001) and (IF 735 or IF 736 or IF 737 or IF 738 or IF 739 or IF 740 or
>>IF 741 or IF 742))'
>> 
>> 
>> Top 10 In/Out If ordered by bytes:
>> Date first seen          Duration Proto         In/Out If    Flows(%)
>>  Packets(%)       Bytes(%)         pps      bps   bpp
>> 2014-07-01 03:02:58.859 2505970.212 any                 642
>>21(58.3) 19919550(68.1) 114895526933(61.4)        7   366789  5767
>> 2014-07-01 03:02:58.859 2442523.524 any                 635
>>15(41.7)  9316049(31.9) 72199731206(38.6)        3   236475  7750
>> 2014-07-08 19:09:55.257 1843153.814 any                 739
>>13(36.1)  8605194(29.4) 55251361230(29.5)        4   239812  6420
>> 2014-07-02 02:06:21.216 1357925.591 any                 737
>>6(16.7)  8405002(28.7) 53630047936(28.7)        6   315952  6380
>> 2014-07-06 02:52:57.297 1466902.533 any                 736
>>7(19.4)  6845484(23.4) 43987579560(23.5)        4   239893  6425
>> 2014-07-05 10:41:26.015 2069416.368 any                 740
>>8(22.2)  5102322(17.5) 32474238205(17.4)        2   125539  6364
>> 2014-07-01 03:02:58.859    30.330 any                 735        2(
>>5.6)   277597( 0.9) 1752031208( 0.9)     9152 462124947  6311
>> 
>> Summary: total flows: 36, total bytes: 187095258139, total packets:
>>29235599, avg bps: 597278, avg pps: 11, avg bpp: 6399
>> Time window: 2014-05-12 19:30:50 - 2014-08-22 18:14:33
>> Total flows processed: 1403144094, Blocks skipped: 0, Bytes read:
>>95420264796
>> Sys: 223.963s flows/second: 6265044.5  Wall: 680.974s flows/second:
>>2060493.6
>> 
>> -paul
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----
>> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
>> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
>> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
>> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
>> 
>>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clk
>>trk
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfdump-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss
>> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Nfdump-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss

Reply via email to