I started looking at this a while ago, but got distracted... There is really only one important change in nfs_client.c, right? The rest are just cstyle things?
I should be done before the end of the day. jim Marcel Telka wrote: >Hi all, > >Nobody interested? :-( >Is there anything important missing what prevents you to do a review? > >Thanks. > >On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:46:49PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I prepared fix for: >> >>6758280 nfs_async_manager doesn't schedule nfs_async_start even if async reqs >>are enqueued >> >>webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aragorn/6758280/ >>root cause: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aragorn/6758280.root_cause >> >>Short root cause summary: >> >>There is a race condition between nfs_async_manager() and a function what is >>enqueuing a new asynch request if such function is called early after the >>nfs_async_manager() thread is created. An example of the racing function is >>nfs_async_putapage(). The same problem is with nfs4_async_manager(). >> >> > > >
