On 04/29/2016 05:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> So cache_inode_close has been replaced with a direct call to FSAL close
> method.
>
> This is not always valid, and might result in loss of state....
>
> With FSAL_VFS having moved to multi-fd support, that isn't an issue, but
> might be an issue with other FSALs.
>
> It also may result in close method being called with an already closed
> object handle...
>
> Will fix up enough that pynfs against FSAL_CEPH doesn't crash.
>
> Frank

I'm confused... It was replaced with fsal_close(), which does the 
non-caching work of cache_inode_close(), plus mdcache_close(), which 
does the caching work?

Daniel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to