> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:18:36AM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > On 09/06/2017 09:09 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > > >On 9/5/17 10:44 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > >>I'm stumped, then. It all looks fine to me. > > >> > > >I think you'll find that things work better by switching to TCP. > > > > > >The UDP client code (clnt_dg) is badly bugged in general. That needs > > >re-writing, but UDP hasn't been a priority. > > > > > >There were unlocked critical regions fixes in ganesha 2.5. > > > > > >In 2.6, we're planning on re-doing the entire call interface to use > > >async callbacks. There's an XXX in clnt_vc circa 2012 mentioning it. > > > > > > Switching to TCP may not be an option, > > Whatever you need to do for this bug, eventually I suspect you want to drop > support for UDP.
Do we genuinely not have any supported clients out there that will end up using UDP? Until we do, I think we need to continue to support UDP as best we can. Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
