On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:00:52AM +0000, Deepak Jagtap wrote: > > What is the actual test? > > - nfs server: RHEL based host exporting ext3 formated SSD. > > - nfs client: RHEL based host running windows vm IOmeter with 70% read, > 30% random workload, 2 worker threads doing IOs with 64 outstanding IO queue > depth each. > > > > What are the export options in the knfsd case? > > - I am using this for exporting using knfsd. > > exportfs -oinsecure,rw,sync,no_root_squash,fsid=77 *:/host/test > > > Is there any reason you're testing ext3 instead of ext4 or xfs? > - Not in particular. I could have used ext4. I was evaluating nfs server > impact in both scenarios. > > >What's the client? What are the kernel versions on server and client? > > - Both of them are at 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 kernel version
That all osunds reasonable to me, thanks.--b. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
